this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
446 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

12295 readers
945 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

“The world has abandoned us,” she added. “They left us to the Taliban, and whatever happens to us now is a result of Western government policies.”

Hear hear.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

So, now we WANT America to perpetually occupy Afghanistan?

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think everyone wanted Afghanistan to not give up immediately and surrender to the Taliban. Fighting spirit like Ukraine.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Almost 20 years of military training and equipment and they did nothing. I get there was probably family on the other side, but the military basically gave up on the dreams of the Afghan women.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

We should (the west as this is not just on the states) have armed and trained the women and not the failsons.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

If we could watch alternate time lines that'd be interesting to watch unfold

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago

we wanted them not to occupy it in the first place.

i think everyone is at loss on how to fix it now.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the only option. It's always occupation or no occupation. No other options exist. /s

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, yes?
There are literally no other options than occupation or no occupation.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago

What are you, a robot? Or are you from the USA? Only seeing black and white.

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, there’s also that bit where we funded fundamentalists during the cold war to try and fuck with the soviets, and the imperialism we and the soviets did that led to radicalization. A problem that we exacerbated which bit us back in the ass a few decades later.

And now the other countries are trying to do similar to us lol.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Saudi was the one who built all the madrassas that created fundie fanatics.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago

I wish the US had spent its efforts and resources towards completely eliminating the Taliban as an institution and ideology rather than kind of shoveling money around to opportunists with no skills for organizing people or maintaining loyalty. I think what happened instead was that the US was afraid of sparking a new movement that would eventually operate outside of its control so it funded what it thought it could control: rich assholes.

And now the religious fascists are back in charge. Wheee.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

American occupation actually strengthened the Taliban compared to before the US came, so America does bear some responsibility for this. Left to their own devices, the Taliban would've likely collapsed under their own weight, but now it's likely they'll stick around for while because of Chinese support.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you see that collapse coming now that the Taliban have total control? Because that was the situation before the US invaded. We should have smashed Al Qaeda and then left, telling them that from now on, we'll leave you alone as long as you leave us alone.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Do you see that collapse coming now that the Taliban have total control?

I mean I did say they now have Chinese support where at the time they'd have been more or less on their own.

Because that was the situation before the US invaded.

Untrue. The pre-2001 Taliban saw fierce resistance from the North Afghan Alliance, among others, and didn't control all the country's territory. Compare to now where there's no meaningful resistance to their reign of terror.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Since when is it the world's responsibility to save you from your superstitions?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

The US invasion strengthened the Taliban and basically killed native resistance to their regime, so the US does bear some responsibility for this.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Since when is it the world's responsibility to explain shit to you?