this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1196 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3240 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

What should happen to Palestinians if Israel is chosen? What should happen to Israelis if Palestine is chosen?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not who you replied to but I like the idea of a single new country for both Palestinians and Israelis. I think this would avoid the ethnostate issue.

Ultimately I think the only way forward is to aim for peaceful coexistence between the two groups.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Great idea! Maybe we could look to history to find the last time that Jews and Muslims lived peacefully together in a single state, and name the new country whatever that is.

Hmmm... Looks like in the 1900s there was a country called Palestine where Muslims and Jews live equally. Let's get rid of Israel and Palestine, and replace them both with Palestine.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think another main component of it would be religion being taken less seriously across the board.

It should be allowed to exist but it should be thought of more as superstition. Sort of like horoscopes or tarot cards.

Then it becomes pretty absurd to commit violence over it. I'm not really sure how to get to this point but there is technically room for both cultures.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is the larger problem, in a nutshell. The fact that we have nations being led by people who believe in their own fairy tales, so much that they believe everybody else is inferior. This isn't just a problem in Israel/Palestine, obviously, but having two of these groups so close to each other really puts a magnifying glass on the danger of non-secular governments. Israel literally believes it has the support of God itself, and its a powerful fuel to their genocide.

I think if we are to survive as a species, one of the humps we need to get over is the existence of all these fairy tales, and the division they create. The fairy tales may have been useful at one point in history, but they have long overstayed their welcome.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Judaism used to be a polytheistic religion, and Islam used to be Judaism. There is no law against polytheism in the Torah. The first commandment, "You shall have no other gods before Me", allows for other gods who are revered less than Elohim. Judaism and Islam do not need to be violent religions. Putting violence in them was a choice that humans made.

The Nakba is not the result of Judaism. It is the result of men like Winston Churchill, who was an agnostic raised Christian. Generations of Jewish Israelis since then have allowed an outsider to define their religion, and tell them to be violent. This is not an issue of religion, it's an issue of human politics.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I do agree however a country that is based on religious participation is fundamentally flawed. I dont think it holds up in that regard. But yes it does have a place in smaller community and in personal life, although I'd argue far less than is shown now.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

There has never been a country called Palestine. What are you talking about?

There are more Arabs living in Israel than there are jews living in all the current Arab nations combined.

In other words : it's not so simple to solve

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Palestine,[i] officially the State of Palestine,[ii][e] is a country

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Palestine

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Your comment was about 1900. Did we already move away from that? Specifics matter in the context of history and geopolitics. Or do we just not care about specifics?

Also, why don’t you address the full comment instead of snipping parts?

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Isn't the issue of a single country that the Palestinian population is much higher than the Israeli population, so if there were a single democracy, it would mean that Palestinians would basically be fully in charge?

I think this is why a federated or two state solution is often suggested. Both parties need at least some level of autonomy.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Isn’t the issue of a single country that the Palestinian population is much higher than the Israeli population, so if there were a single democracy, it would mean that Palestinians would basically be fully in charge?

Should we segregate America just because some minorities are outnumbered?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

The idea is ultimately that the people mix and there is no real barrier between the two groups anyways. There should still be places to worship for everyone although I think religion needs to be taken less seriously all around as part of that. Religion creates division just like race does.

I think the state I'm envisioning is after the part you are talking about though. Its likely there will be a period of imbalance but that does not mean that the bigger group cannot be fair to the smaller one.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

No, Gaza+ west bank are a little smaller than Israel in terms of population

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Israel has made it clear that it wants to exterminate Palestinians, and is literally in the process of doing so right now.

Palestinians are not genocidal. They don't want to exterminate Israelis. They just want to be able to go home and stop being killed and starved and tortured.

Israelis can assimilate into Palestine and stop trying to make a Jewish ethnostate. Palestine can be one multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious democracy.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Palestinians are not genocidal. They don’t want to exterminate Israelis.

Even if some or most do wish to exterminate, this is arguably understandable. How many bombs would have to fall on you and your family before you were extremely angry? Maybe even, we could say, rationally angry?

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Palestinians have entire documents and conferences on what to do with non-useful Jews. As for the useful ones, they will not be allowed to flee Palestine. Doctors and such will be prevented from emigrating.

There are no angels in this conflict. Both sides have desires for a genocide.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Certainly there are factions within Palestine that are genocidal. They're not in charge of anything, though, and don't represent the mainstream.

Meanwhile, the Israeli genicidiers control the government and are a mainstream cultural force.

They are not the same.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The conference was hosted by Hamas.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hamas isn't lead by the people it was lead by even a decade ago. Their more recent 2017 charter is pretty explicitly not genocidal, they are anti-Israeli and explicitly not anti-Jewish.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Said conference was held in 2021. But I guess maybe a couple of years is enough time to reform a genocidal group.

Maybe Hamas leadership changed their tune towards murdering regular Jewish people sometime after that?

Certainly an analysis of their actions since that time will show their more peaceable trajectory…

That only the Israeli govt is capable of carrying out their genocide tendencies doesn’t mean Hamas doesn’t have genocidal tendencies.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 weeks ago

I never claimed they're peaceful. They want to kill settlers and IDF goons and they want to destroy the Israeli occupation. Hardly peaceful.

But that's not genocide. That's just people's war.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I say we find land for each of them someplace in the US, build infrastructure and housing, evacuate Jerusalem and bulldoze it.