this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
760 points (99.0% liked)

science

14791 readers
58 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh what a dumpster fire take.

Also, if you wanted to try to fool simpler minds than yours into believing you are informed, and not an inbred mouth breather, at least attend to your spelling. 'Indites' is not a word. You and MTG really struggle with that one hey?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

https://www.google.com/search?q=indite&oq=indite&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDI0MjVqMGo3qAIPsAIB&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

You're an idiot.

I don't need to fool anyone. I don't care whether someone else is fooled and takes the injection or not.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I really don't believe you went with the archaic spelling over the standard one on purpose. If you did, why?

https://www.grammarly.com/commonly-confused-words/indict-vs-indite

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They're trying to tell me that I'm imagining their antivax take. I think they just want to try to get away with saying ridiculous things by pretending they either never said them or said them on purpose despite that being silly.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I went with the spelling that's on the paperwork my shitty lawyer gave me.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

So you meant to say "Cincinnati will literally compose people without a shred of evidence" ?

Is that correct?