this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
105 points (96.5% liked)

Movies

7480 readers
235 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (6 children)

From the article:

  • Jaws: The Revenge (1987)
  • Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019)
  • Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)
  • Independence Day: Resurgence (2016)
  • Coming 2 America (2021)
  • A Good Day to Die Hard (2013)
  • Friday the 13th: A New Beginning (1985)
  • Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987)
  • Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 (2000)
  • Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023)
  • Highlander II: The Quickening (1991)
  • Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977)
  • Curse of the Cat People (1944)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Quantumania wasn't bad. It just wasn't great. There are many Marvel and DC sequels that were worse both critically and financially.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm torn because its inclusion feels like recency bias but I wonder if over time it will seem even more ill advised considering how much it does to try to set up a Kang storyline that never got off the ground.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's not really the movie's fault though. That is solely on Majors.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jagermo@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago

Assault / domestic violence

[–] grayhaze@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We enjoyed Quantumania, but that could have been influenced by us watching it in a 4DX cinema. Sure there were issues, but it can't really be criticised for setting up Kang as the next big bad as that was the plan at the time.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was pretty bad. Something being worse doesn't make it not bad.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But the list is supposed to be the absolute worst sequels, not a random list of not great sequels.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah... and Coming 2 America wasn't as awful as many on that list. I was pleasantly surprised despite the stupid title name. No where near as good as the original, but better than expected.

I can't recall Star Trek Nemesis, but I've seen all the Star Trek films and I never thought any were bad enough to be put on this list.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That's a good point. You win... this time.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I havent seen a single one of those

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've seen technically less than half but "Coming 2 America" is on my TODO list, so more than half eventually. Of the nearly half I've seen... I've seen worse.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've seen less than half of you half as well as I'd like and less than half of you have as well as you deserve.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I have to go now. Goodbye.

[–] bitflag@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Looks about right. Those that I have seen on this list were mediocre at best, and a far cry from the quality of the previous movie(s) which would have been fine being left alone.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is jaws the revenge the one where the lady could have just moved to another town away from the ocean?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Solid list. I only disagree with one of them, personally.