Comic Books

1652 readers

27 users here now

A place to discuss comic books of all types, from old to new, Big 2 to indie, and everything in between.

Floppies, graphic novels, compilations, omnibusses (omnibusi?) are all fair game.

There is only one rule:*

Comic Books is a no judgement zone.

You can talk all you want about how Rob Liefeld is trash, Bob Kane is an asshole, or Frank Miller and Dave Sim’s politics have made them toxic, that’s all good.

If, however, another user is LEGITIMATELY a fan of something you don’t like, that does NOT make them a lesser person. Attack the art for being bad, not the person for being a fan of bad art.

* I lied. There are TWO rules... No piracy. Cover shots? That's good. Interior pages, in moderation? Sure. Full books? Links to pirate sites? That's how we get things shut down. :(

I'm not saying it's been a problem, because it hasn't been.

See our sister sites!

Marvel Studios! For all the latest on the Marvel Cinematic Universe!

https://lemmy.world/c/marvelstudios

For other cinematic content, hit up Movies! Aquaman is coming soon, followed by the big reboot!

https://lemmy.world/c/movies

And don't forget Movies and TV over at lemm.ee! A good place for discussing Marvel, DC and other film and television properties!

https://lemm.ee/c/moviesandtv

Want to talk BOOK books? See Books!

https://lemmy.world/c/books

Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay? Becoming Superman? John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood? That's the place!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

jordanlund@lemmy.world

116

Marvel and DC lose shared "Super Hero" US trademark after not responding to courts (bleedingcool.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Microw@lemm.ee to c/comicbooks@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The law firm of Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg (RJLF) has announced a landmark victory in its trademark case against comics publishers Marvel and DC Comics. They have obtained an order from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office cancelling Marvel and DC Comics' joint trademark for the word "Super Hero" and thus allowing everyone to freely use the term.

This was granted after Marvel and DC failed to respond to court requests. RJLF represents their clients, S.J. Richold and Superbabies Limited, in the case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago (6 children)

That's weird. I never would have thought they owned the term, even jointly.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t believe you have to “own” it per se. You either have to be currently using it, or plan to use it, and then file for it.

I’m glad to see that the courts made the right decision here.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A trademark is exactly that: Ownership. Anybody else using it has to pay you a license fee for permission, or can be denied using it. They have most definitely used the term all over, and might have prevented others from using it. Hard to tell.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wasn’t clear about it in my post; I was referring to requirements when applying for a trademark. But you’re right that when you’re granted a trademark, you then own whatever it is that is trademarked.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At the end of the article it has a list of actions they have taken using the trademark.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Some of the actions listed at bottom of the article seem like over reach:

In 1996, an Australian company Hero Marketing Pty Ltd applied for a trade mark, opposed by DC Comics and Marvel and eventually cancelled the trade mark.

load more comments (3 replies)