this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
374 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
5024 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

state audits and data compiled by groups across the political spectrum have found no indication that noncitizens are voting in large numbers.

Basically, rules imposing additional requirements on voter registration prevent vastly more citizens from voting than noncitizens, since the latter aren't trying to vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

For once, I'm begging the GOP to shut down the government. God that would be so fucking funny if they sealed the deal for Harris.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Shutting down the government also means we stop doing any and all government work. That includes NASA, and anything else funded by tax dollars. I'd rather they just do their damn jobs and fund the government so I can do my job.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On the one hand that's super fair, and I totally understand that. The fact that I'm open to this prospect isn't me saying that the government shutting down is a good thing unto itself in the same way that being open to chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer isn't me saying that cytotoxins rule and I love how they make my body feel.

Another Trump term means a bare minimum of four years where not only is actually important government work not getting done, but its efforts are actively redirected toward harmful ends. (And as we've seen from his fascist rhetoric, this likely ends up being much more than four years; even if he does leave office at the end of that term, the US government would spend decades recovering from his fuckery.) The GOP shooting themselves in the foot by making it more likely to get Harris into office and make Congress bluer than it would've been would mean that whatever issues the government shutdown would create would be vastly outweighed by the benefits of a functioning government and the avoidance of a second Trump term. It's not a guarantee, but Harris really needs all the help she can get right now, as this race is still too close for comfort.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I agree, shutdowns suck, but a month or 2 of crappiness is nothing compared to years of a Trump presidency.

If a shutdown is what it takes to seal a Harris presidency, so he it I say

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

a month or 2 of crappiness is nothing compared to years of a Trump presidency.

On the surface, you're right.

However, to some people, that month or two of pay could be the difference between having a home or not and, depending on where in the country they live, that could be permanent or even deadly.

I agree with you that Trump and his fascist cult MUST be stopped, but we still need to be careful not to irreparably harm innocents in the process..

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think we need to shutdown the government to beat Trump.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but why interrupt our enemies when they're devouring each other / making a mistake?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because a government shutdown could permanently destroy the lives of people who are dependent on the government to function, stave off homelessness, or even survive.

Ditto.

Now, it's actually unusual when a party is punished for a shutdown - as per https://time.com/6317658/government-shutdown-gop-elections-virginia/ past shutdowns that the GOP got the blame for didn't really seem to hurt them later.

However, the key point from that article is this,

It was an early sign that anger over a largely pointless shutdown is not destined to necessarily last long.

We've never had a shutdown this close to a presidential election, let alone during one. That might keep the pain fresh enough to actually cost the GOP, for once.