this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
595 points (98.2% liked)

Antiwork

8183 readers
10 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Who the fuck would call their employee after hours? In none of the places I've ever worked, would the boss even think about calling me to do something when I'm not at work. Nobody would expect me to answer. You don't need a law about basic things like that.

[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

This law isn't catered to you personally, don't you think there are bosses or work places that call their employees after hours - it's pretty common. I don't mind, but I get mails and messages after hours and just answer them.

It does effect me without me knowing in some ways, but I personally feel it's more important to help someone, that also might be stressed and decide to contact me, for some help or questions.

If the person or boss isn't an asshole I don't mind, but not everyone has that luxury, of having a boss that cares. Often they don't want to contact you after hours.

[–] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why I do respond sometimes out of my own convenience I'm careful to schedule the message for work hours so it's clear to people when they can expect a response.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, once you set a precedent, next thing you know that boundary is gone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)