this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
1218 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

10340 readers
3253 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 257 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The weird thing is, they don't actually sell the jars anymore. "Ball jars" are not made by the ball jar corporation after their antitrust lawsuits for being a fucking jar monopoly. So they sold the "ball jar" rights and now only do aluminum cans for food packaging and high end satellites and satellite launch systems.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 176 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

now only do aluminum cans for :

  • food packaging
  • high end satellites
  • satellite launch systems.

I find this interpretation funny

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aluminum cylinders only.

Not aluminum? Not interested. Not a cylinder? Not a chance.

Squared off glass cylinder? Legally prohibited.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Transparent aluminum? Believe it or not, jail.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Galaxy watch 5 users start to worry.

[–] Pantrygheist@programming.dev 49 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Most advanced cans in the airspace industry

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 40 points 2 weeks ago

Well they don't produce can'ts

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

those 🕘 sweet 🕞sweet🕞 cans🕓

[–] And009@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No monopoly lawsuits in space

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The year is 3506. The Deimos Corporation has expanded into Phobos, Luna, and all the other moons of the solar system.

Making it... A moonopoly.

[–] metostopholes@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They don't even do aerospace anymore. Ball Aerospace & Technologies was bought by BAE Systems earlier this year.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well then what would you say you do here

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Let me tell you. bob.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

BAE caught them slipping, huh?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 weeks ago

On December 11, 1939, the U.S. Government sued the Ball Brothers, the Hazel-Atlas Glass Co., and the Owens-Illinois Glass Co. under monopoly charges based on the Hartford-Empire and Owens licensing agreements. The plaintiff claimed that small producers were being frozen out of business or prohibited from entering manufacture by the nature of the licenses. Almost a decade later, in 1947, the justices rendered a final verdict. The court prohibited the Ball Brothers from purchasing or otherwise controlling any other businesses engaged in the same manufacturing processes – in other words, the small jar producers. In addition, Ball had to divest itself of the Three Rivers Glass Co. (already closed for almost a decade) that Ball had acquired in 1936. Ball sold the property

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

oh thats good to know. i've got a few satellites lying around that i've been meaning to launch

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They really had that industry….by the Balls.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe at a lemon party.

[–] Teal@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn’t aware of the jar monopoly situation. Maybe my old Balls will become collectible someday.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Came here to say this.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

why is the government beefing with mason jar companies and not multi-billionaires

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

So, at the time (1930) ball jar actually would have qualified as big business in the sense that you mean.
Home canning was very popular and they consistently bought out smaller companies.
Since they were privately owned, it's tricky to find specifics about value, but they were "found a university", "own a company town or two", "chairman of the federal reserve" levels of rich.

So actually a pretty good use of government.