this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
397 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

11840 readers
1027 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm wondering if EVs shouldn't have mechanism where if fire is detected the bottom part (which holds the batteries) would simply separate and fall to the ground exposing the batteries to firemen and making it easier to stop the fire.

[–] almost1337@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like it could also work as a hot-swap battery pack, where you could drive up to a carwash style apparatus which takes your low charge battery and puts in a fully charged one.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Could help, but could also add a lot of weight and complexity to handle an issue that is exceedingly rare.

Do ICE vehicles ever eject their gas tanks?

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 weeks ago

In the majority of cases, its still going to be stuck under a mangled car that you cant move because it is on fire. A better solution might be to route multiple 'flood tubes' to the battery compartment and place them in easy accessible places. That way you would just need to pop pff an access panel and hook up a hose.