this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
666 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

31982 readers
521 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A cookie notice that seeks permission to share your details with "848 of our partners" and "actively scan device details for identification".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I'm colorblind for what it's worth and I don't go around yelling at people for making badly colored charts I can't understand in the rudest way possible.

The image captures the web page design / the cookie banner, it's more than "just the words" so for a non-blind person "just post the text" is actually arguably a downgrade.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean this is literally the purpose of alt text, so that you can share an image and its description (which in this case should contain all the text from the image) and screen readers can do their thing.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I actually didn't realize their was support for alt-text. The clients I've used the few times when I've posted images ... I don't recall even prompting for alt text.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

Even without direct support for alt text, you can achieve the same result by posting it all in the post body.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But you should, since there are accessibility rules against low contrast.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just because there's a "rule" that exists somewhere in the abstract, that doesn't mean folks should assail people for innocent mistakes. It's also not a rule of this community. It's not a rule of the instance this community is a part of. It's most definitely not a rule of "the platform."

In fact, these the W3C (the body most people are seemingly citing as a source for rules) isn't even calling their "rules", rules. They call them "guidelines" https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/.

Ya, I'm colorblind, but you're probably not and you probably didn't think about it. You're just some random person on the internet, you've probably got plenty of other things to worry about than hunting down the latest WC3 publication on accessibility.

To be clear, I do let folks know if there's a chart I'm interested in reading that I can't read, try to give feedback about colorblind relevant stuff, etc. (literally last night I was on the Deadlock forums giving Valve accessibility feedback). I just do it in a "matter of the fact" fashion and try to explain what I'm struggling with rather than with an attitude and command that they change something without any context.