this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
858 points (97.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12591 readers
4178 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

If you look at how much the climate has changed over the last billion years (or heck, the last 3.5) and the events that have happened, it's tough to imagine life not surviving handily even if a lot of species go extinct.

What we're doing is going to be traumatic , but it's nothing like, say, the absolute decimation of life 65 million years ago, etc. And life flourished again not long after.

It actually feels kind of conceited to me to think that we're even capable of wiping out all life on the planet. Even if full on, worldwide nuclear war l with our entire arsenal broke out, I wouldn't expect it.

What we're doing is a 5-alarm fire for us, but for the planet it will be a blip.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah even full on nuclear war won't be as bad as the big asteroid 65 million years ago. Life will be fine for the next 1.5 billion years until all the water evaporates.

[–] Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Once water starts getting even a little sparse for everyone I fear shit is gonna go off the rails quick

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

We'd be able to create megastructures to shield or replenish the water by then. Whatever the "we" is then. Or just build a shit ton of orbitals, much better mass to real estate ratio.