I saw this discussion in the comment section of some post, and it was about what the vote should be used for and how there is no official guideline for how to use it. I thought this was such a good question, that it deserved a post of its own. Related question would be if there should be multiple scores with different meanings, through which posts can be sorted.
I agree with everything you said. But for me, it's an argument FOR trying to create an useful system for everyone, instead of not trying. We all would have benefits.
I agree. That's why the system should account for that, which is the core of the reason for the system. It's not something that should exist "despite" human behavior. It should exist because of it. For me, this is the reason for the system.
Some people will ignore the information. But if we come up with a good and clear user interface, and the rules are simple and actively encouraged and explained, then hopefully more and more people will use it - and create a benefit for everyone.
Reddit sadly didn't do that - for their benefit, because they sell data, and gut reactions and one-liners are worth more than informed and well written discussion.
Fair enough, I thought you were arguing that it could be perfect and was just offering a word of caution. I agree these systems can be improved upon, and should.
Yeah agree, it's just the usual case of capitalism perverting technology (or really, mostly everything it touches, commodification is really tragedy).