this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
415 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4887 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/11490832

NOAA also collects and analyzes key climate data

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Living in hurricane country, I have a big problem with that.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

Don't worry we can redirect hurricanes with a sharpie pretty easily.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do your neighbors? I am genuinely curious how things like this that seem so often to so negatively affect their constituents continue to be the GOP platform.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

A lot of this stuff is so awful that if you tell people about it, they don't believe it because nobody could be that evil

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 2 months ago

"It's really the Democrats that want to do that! You know how I know? Because the media says Republicans are doing that!"

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't believe it because they're goddamned morons.

These asshats have no fucking clue what good a government for the people has done. They take roads, electricity, water, mail, weather predictions, communications, etc. for granted. There are no libertarians when the road right outside your house is privatized and the owner doesn't want you to use it.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It doesn't even have to be something important like "they're trying to kill public education." They wouldn't even believe the reporting on how much Trump golfed.

https://www.businessinsider.com/poll-trump-obama-golf-2017-4

[–] riskable@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago

All ya need to track a hurricane is a sharpie!

Trump used a sharpie on a printed hurricane prediction map to pretend like he knew what he was talking about

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

God damned liberuls

[–] memfree@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Tell people 2025 would do this. No federal weather means local counties would have to pay Big Business for tornado/hurricane warnings. We'd pay more for fish because fishermen can't get data unless they pay. Plane schedules become even less reliable AND cost more because the government stops tracking upper level wind speeds.

Look: we want people who get a salary for doing accurate work rather than people who get paid to say whatever the bossman want to hear. Ask people to imagine how it would work if Google, NBC, Amazon, and Fox each sunk the money for trying to replicate the existing infrastructure and then sold pieces of it to paying customers -- such as Allstate, CBS, and Delta Airlines. Everyone else would have to HOPE they were getting complete data and have to wonder what was missing. Noticing record highs and lows would become proprietary and forbidden from broadcast in a way akin to being disallowed from referencing "The Superbowl" unless you pay for a license. How's any of that going to make things better?

P.S. This article is posted to several communities, so I'm reiterating this post repeatedly.