this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

2639 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

This is what happens when a company has no diversity. Most companies dogfood their own production. Reminds me of Google's gorilla situation...

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s what I was thinking. How did this slip by? If I recall correctly, Toyota is better than average when it comes to quality control. This is Boeing-level laziness/incompetence.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 5 months ago

Probably they knew of the issue, but didnt figure a solution before the deadline.

[–] Hubi@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This happens even on newer Toyotas, so it's not exactly company-specific. The issue is the biased training data used for the face recognition system.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

This seems more like an excuse. All these companies aren't using the same training data.

They literally never tested this on an asian person before selling in the vehicle...

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Your claim is a Japanese company never tested on Asian people? Would you place a bet on those odds?

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Toyota in the US is more American than most American car companies. The tech being different isn't that big of a stretch.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 5 months ago

Or potentially it did, found the issue, and werent able to solve before the deadline