this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
255 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

42502 readers
1384 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Should we stop supporting them with our eyes for taking sponsorships from shady companies?

Edit: I took my first step and unsubscribed from the channel and I will continue to withhold my viewership to those that don’t take better care of the viewers.

Likely doesn’t matter, but I’m on a roll of not giving my money to companies that are immoral so why not do the same with my eyes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Veratasium had some similar issue a few years ago too, didn't he?

[–] Pirky@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was a video he did on a startup taxi service using self driving cars. Basically the entire thing was an advertisement for that company.
Then another Youtuber, Tom Nicholas, released a video about that a few months later and how it's an issue. I'll have to watch it again as I don't remember what he specifically talks about.

Yeeep I remember the saga bc of the Tom Nicholas video

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

His video with one of those "genetic research" companies was very bad anti-privacy propaganda, where they used the excuse of catching the Golden State Killer as justification for storing and using the related genetic information of masses of unconsenting individuals.

He's also dipped several times into making state department propaganda like Smarter Every Day consistently does. Not nearly quite as bad as him yet though.

And he's made several videos about failures of capitalism, wherein he very obviously refuses to identify it as the problem. Like the one about planned obsolescence or leaded gasoline and another I'm forgetting.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

He also has a habit of making videos that are just long ads, like that self-driving car, or that shampoo

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

I've watched his leaded gasoline video, capitalism doesn't seem like something he would need to bring up? Unless I'm not remembering the video correctly, the cause of the problems aren't something he goes into

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I recall Tom Nichols making a video on them and also perhaps an incorrect video about electricity so probably.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

The electricity one wasn't so much him being wrong as it was him being really bad at communicating that one point

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the electricity video, he was actually correct. It was mostly a matter of semantics and people clinging to the common models of electricity.

[–] xionzui@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I’m not really sure it was just semantics. He was technically correct the light would get some power right away, but the thing everyone would understand when hearing the main assertion, i.e. the light is fully lit and the circuit is in its relatively steady, final state, is very much not true.