Asklemmy

43856 readers

1700 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

are there any anonymous board or forum besides 4chan? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 5 months ago by kionite231@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

In case of 4chan it's obviously other anonymous imageboards. There doesn't seem to functionality in Lemmy that would allow for posting without accounts.

[–] andrew_s@piefed.social 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Accounts (which contain the private key that signs the headers in your posts, and the public key to verify) are required for ActivityPub to work.

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

hmm, maybe I should open an issue on github about it? however it will make moderating communities difficult.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not possible really. The protocol Lemmy uses requires accounts, not only as a soft requirement, but the software your instance would be interacting with requires it to function.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

It could always use an "anonymous" pseudo-account, (ie, have anonymous posts federate as anonymous@instance.com), or a pseudo-account per post (anonymous1@instance.com, anonymous2, etc). Thinking about it, the former has the advantage of being easy to block by instances or comms that don't like it.

[+] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I imagine it wouldn't be hard to add that functionality to an instance, but given the pearl clutching Lemmy instance admins are prone to it would be defed pretty quickly.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It would be defed pretty quickly because all bots, alt right trolls, pedophiles and anyone looking to share illegal content would instantly flock to it.

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Amen, Sopuli wouldn't federate with such instance either. It would introduce too much problems. Bad idea.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

From what I've seen 4chan seems to be able to keep at least two of those out with captcha and jannnies.

You'd probably need to limit anonymous posting to local communities to prevent issues though.

[–] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 13 points 5 months ago

Sorry you being able to store child porn on my instance is considered pearl clutching. No fucking way I want that responsibility because I like to read memes.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tell you what: you go host that instance, with no pearl-clutching. Don't worry about any knocks at the door, or federal agents abseiling through your windows. You don't clutch no pearls, right?

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 0 points 5 months ago

My point was more that instance admins defed for things that are comparatively minor, relative to allowing anonymous posting, not that allowing anonymous posting is a good idea (even if it's technically possible).