this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16748 readers
1283 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was going to ask, "Who the hell pays for cheats," but then I remembered that the mobile gaming industry is a thing. Sooo, I guess there's pretty well-established precedent for this sort of nonsense.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One would and wouldn't be surprised. I just abandoned a texas poker app on mobile and it's sickening to see how many people pay up cheaters just to get billions and even a trillion chips. Then I see them on the table and they always win.

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 1 points 5 months ago

I've dropped every multiplayer mobile game I've ever had because of cheaters. Most recent was Sonic Forces, because once you get up in the ranks, just about every race would include someone who just ignores hazards.

Mobile multiplayer games are just not worth it in any capacity. Hell, mobile games in general, I'd say, given the proliferation of positively abusive advertising schemes.