this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
380 points (100.0% liked)

196

16196 readers
2822 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source

And for anyone who wants to check: US release of "The Matrix" was March 31st 1999

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It is too bad they weren't able to make Switch a trans character.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don’t think I’ve heard about the trans plan for the character before. But, it sounds like the perfect kind of thing to have in the Matrix. :(

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Another major plot point that got shit-canned: The original idea was that the humans would be distributed computing power for the machines, not batteries. That makes a lot more sense, but the studio thought that explanation would be too technical (i.e. confusing) for the audience.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I simultaneously wish they didn’t change that, and understand that they were probably right to do it. I bet if they focus group tested it with random consumers, an 80/20 split preferred the battery over the distributed compute node.

I mean, to the layperson, describing neutral networks, distributed computing, system redundancy, parallelism, and everything else probably sounds like Star Trek or Terminator technobabble.

Maybe not so much in modern times dice “AI” language models and image synthesizers have put some of those terms on the evening news.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago

They wouldn't have to explain it in any detail. It's not like they explained the battery concept in any detail. All they need is, "they hijacked your brain for its computing power, you may notice you need less sleep outside the matrix."

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The original idea was that the humans would be distributed computing power for the machines, not batteries.

I had no idea about this, but that has been my head-canon for about 25 years now. The idea that the machines needed human brains for specially-biased RNG, creativity, emotions, advanced pattern recognition, or anything else AI tends to lack, just makes way more sense. But electricity clearly isn't one of those.

So Morpheus holding up a microchip instead of a battery would be no less poignant and, IMO, would absolutely be understandable by a broad audience. It also has a kind of dramatic symmetry that is way more poignant.

The battery theory is explainable by bad intel from the machines, humanity coming to a bad conclusion on their own, or Morpheus dumbing reality down for his recruiting speech. The last one fits well considering that he's talking to someone that thought he/she was living in the past, prior to the invention of artificial life. Saying something like "you're like the battery from your Walkman" is close enough to get the point across.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 5 months ago

chainsaw revving in the background

"Not like this... Not like this!"