this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1481 points (100.0% liked)
196
16553 readers
3066 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Abstaining does not mean "you are okay with either option" abstaining is a vote for people not having a choice.
Idk if it is same in us, but we have what is called blank voting, which is a vote that could be that. But not voting is a fascist statement.
The US doesn't have a parliamentary system. It is winner take all. There are no votes of no-confidence. There are no coalition governments. The winner of the electoral college which is NOT popular vote gets full control with no oversight.
If you vote for a party that does not win, you get zero representation, not partial or proportional representation.
So abstaining truly does mean you don't care.
I don't even think it's a democracy
It most definitely is NOT. It's a oligarchian theocracy at this point and deserves to crumble.
That's interesting! What county? How does blank voting work? I'm wondering how I'd do that with my US voting machine. Not that I would, but I wonder.
Sweden, there is a specific paper you take among the options that says blank vote, you can also put in slips with blank votes when there is options to check on a public vote and it will be tallied. When many blank votes are cast, it could basically invalidate any of the other options too meaning we need a new one
That's wonderful! We don't have that.
Could you clarify how not voting is specifically a fascist statement?
Like what if there aren't any fascists on the ballot? Or why would not voting only be a vote towards fascism rather than towards libertarian, anarchism, moderatism or any other kind of "ism" out there?
Because you wish people had no say in how they are ruled