this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1481 points (100.0% liked)

196

16553 readers
2957 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1481
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

FAQ

Q: why not organize and stop treating the bus as a legitimate entity? why aren’t you working to stop the bus?

A: do both. cut the fuel line. break windows. put oatmeal in the gas tank. but maybe your efforts don’t succeed this election cycle. and if so don’t fucking throw away your vote if it can help your neighbors fucking survive. “harm reduction” is not a political strategy for action. it is a last minute, end of the line decision to save lives, after all other resources have been exhausted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not ”just optics”. Per your source he did pardon 6,500 individuals, which the Last Prisoner Project described as “progress for those eligible for relief.”

Now they do argue that the Biden administration should go further by pardoning 3,000 additional people, which I agree with. But to call this step forward “just optics” is at best disingenuous.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not nothing, but it's barely anything. He could also deschedule cannabis.

[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not nothing, but it’s barely anything.

Tell that to the 6,500 people that got their freedom back.

And I reject your assertion that it’s barely anything: by your source’s count he pardoned 2/3 of the people caught up in these archaic cannabis laws.

Referencing back to OP, would you rather have 2/3 of an ice cream cone or go off a cliff?

He could also deschedule cannabis

No, he likely cannot unilaterally do that: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/can-president-biden-legalize-marijuana-1220802/

Do you at least acknowledge that slow incremental progress, while admittedly not nearly enough, is definitely better than going backwards?

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

There are different opinions about who has the power to deschedule cannabis, but Biden has not even tried. He is working on rescheduling, but that seems to be an "incremental step" that would also cause problems

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahsinclair/2024/03/18/biden-says-hes-taking-care-of-federal-cannabis-laws-but-is-rescheduling-enough/?sh=290affc94e8d

I think that boycotting a vote on Democrats until they adopt leftist politics is a completely valid way to move the party. Republicans have essentially done the same, remember the Tea Party movement? It worked for them. The "incrementalist" approach has left us with a president who won't even say the word Genocide, worse is activity funding genocide.