this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
208 points (98.6% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WARSAW, Poland (AP) β€” The Russian ambassador to Poland did not show up Monday for a meeting at the Polish Foreign Ministry where he had been summoned because of a Russian cruise missile that violated Polish airspace on the weekend, the Polish ministry’s spokesman said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

So, assuming that he was acting under orders from the Foreign Ministry and not on his own -- which I assume is the case, given that Moscow's had enough hours to sort this out if he was just going off the rails individually -- you figure that Russia wants to have an international spat over this. I wonder what they aim to gain? Some kind of "look, NATO is being hostile" thing for the Russian public? I don't really see how Russia gains from this.

If that's the position that Moscow has and intends to maintain this position, then declaring him persona non grata and ejecting him from Poland means that presumably Poland's going to just do a similar declaration for each new replacement ambassador who gets sent in, since it's not actually the ambassador that's the factor in question.

Poland could totally break diplomatic relations, but I don't think that they'd say that this warrants that.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You are thinking too far.

The Russian position is "What missile? We never send a missile there! Did you see a missile? Where are the pictures of the missile? We didn't see a missile!"

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If that's the Russian position then it's the ambassador's duty to tell the Poles.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thats what they did. They claim Poland did not provide any evidence of any missile in polish airspace to them, therefore there is no reason for them to come. It is the "this is so wrong it does not warrant further attention" approach.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

If they wanna gaslight they should at least have the decency to do it in person.

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'd wager they're fishing for what Poland's response will be to the missile issue, and seeing how far they can 'push it', whilst still feeling comfortable themselves.

They already know that they aren't going to be on good terms with Poland for a long time so may just be feeling Poland out so they know what they can get away with before the incident escalates too far.