this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
146 points (95.1% liked)

BestOfLemmy

6936 readers
36 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://dubvee.org/post/861635

Not OC: Just found this on my old hard drive while grabbing some other stuff.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neuropean@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Non-IT, but dealt with the range of them. I feel like QA is probably the most important job, but hear me out.

Developers achieve the objective. We’re living in their reality.

Designers make it useful, without them it would be an esoteric product.

Project managers take the reigns and keep things moving along. Without them, feature bloat and endless development cycles would occur.

QA is the one linking everything to the public. They seem superfluous, but they are the safeguard. Are they tedious? Yes. Are they a PITA? Also yes. But their objective is to ask a single question: “is this gonna come back to bite somebody in the ass?” Is probably the most important and they’re the first person who gets paid to think about it in any detail aside from the sys admin.

The sys admin, to be fair, is literally Neo from the matrix, left to stop every visible bullet left from QA (such that they’re visible bullets and not a wall of lead). They know the damage and triage the wounded, can’t blame them for being bitter about dealing with the wounded every day.

But we all know deep down that engineer that has the mentality, “how can we…” but doesn’t necessarily think through every possible way that we apes can mess things up. And to that effect, enough monkeys banging on typewriters for long enough, something is gonna go wrong.

Perspective from a biologist, so keep your salt unless you’re gonna bitch about your blots.

[–] pooberbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

I actually think QA is the one that shouldn't be a separate role. Test cases ought to be written by the product owner or project manager as part of defining a feature to implement, and they should do manual testing of a feature before marking it done. Implementing automated tests is probably already the developer's job.

[–] CbtB@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 months ago

As a dev I worked with a QA person who also took on the project management role. Pairing with a skilled QA more than doubled my productivity. Big props to QA if they are willing to embed and iterate.