this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)

World News

38750 readers
2843 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The article refers very specifically to a situation I. 2022.

If you think I’m trolling , find me the communication, speech or transcript, from 2022, where putin said he was going to use nukes in Ukraine

It’s needs to be prime source, please. Not An article saying “Putin said”.

you won’t find it , because jt doesn’t exist.

You will instead be confronted with the fact that somewhere along the way, you have lost the ability determine what is a real piece of journalism, and what is click bait, for dead heads.

Edit : and if you are paying attention, I’ve made no comment on the war itself . Only the quality of the articl. So my best advice, is take a deep breath and d carefully consider the words you read, before formulating an opinion and writing a reply.

[–] cooljacob204@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think you just have a hard time comprending what a threat to do something is.

Threats are not often direct statements if intent. Other things like moving nuclear weapons closer to the front is a form of threats. Or saying you will use nukes to defend your territory then shortly passing a law which claims the land you invaded as your territory.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Removed, Civility:

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

[–] cooljacob204@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Lol it what world is my comment above a personal attack or being uncivil.

But them gaslighting everyone on the forums about Russian nuclear threats being fake news isn't smh.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I was debating putting a /s on there, I guess I should've oops

I 100% agree with you, I was making fun of that one account copying and pasting rules in reply to comments calling out that kind of mis/disinformation

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey buddy, bring the those goalposts back over here.

[–] cooljacob204@kbin.social 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Okay completely unsubstantial reply. English must not be your first language if you don't consider those clear examples of a threat.

русский бот

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

What do you want me to do ? You’ve completely strawmanned it. You wanna argue about what can be interpreted as a threat, go ahead, but you’ll need to find someone interested.

I’ve shown that this is a garbage article, that’s not original work but instead written about another article, which itself was based on a non specific threat. Which is the only claim I ever made.

On the other hand, You’ve shown you’ll buy anything you read on the internet, and that you prefer to argue with people rather than do any thinking - and I’m afraid that’s not my problem.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

September 21, 2022 ... In an address to Russians Putin announced he would call up 300,000 reservists to fight in Ukraine and backed a plan to annex parts of the country, hinting to the West he was prepared to use nuclear weapons to defend Russia. "If the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will use all available means to protect our people - this is not a bluff," Putin said.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/exclusive-nato-chief-says-putins-ukraine-escalation-dangerous-reckless-2022-09-21/

"I would like to remind those who make such statements about Russia that our country also possesses various means of destruction, and in some cases they are more modern than those of NATO countries. When the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we, of course, will use all the means at our disposal to protect Russia and our people. This is not a bluff. And those who try to blackmail us with nuclear weapons should know that the weathervane can turn and point towards them."

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-president-vladimir-putin-announces-partial-mobilisation-2022-09-21/

And video:

https://youtu.be/e8gZUQMqDAI?t=91

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Removed, racism against Russians is still racism.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

/s

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago

No good mate . No nuclear threat, unless attacked with nuclear weapons. This is literally everyone stance on nukes - apart from maybe the Norks .

‘We will use any means necessary to defend our people …blah blah’. Is the most generic war time rhetoric going.

Read it without bias.