Not The Onion

12303 readers

1143 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

107

Russia and China plan to install a nuclear power plant on the Moon (intlmonitor.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you think your commute is bad now..

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For what? Who's going to use that power?

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The lunar night is 14 days long. During this time you don't get any sunlight for generating solar power. If you want a permanent base in the moon you need a continuous power source. Oh and also to power that mass driver they're going to use to threaten the entire world with destruction.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I think it should be coal

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Permanent base? Are we already capable to build such things on the moon?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

A lot of people believe we can, yes. However there are a few technologies that still need to be developed, such as a reliable power source that can work during a long lunar night

solar won’t work, because night is too long
RTGs can’t scale up enough to power a base
Fission reactors as we have them so far generally rely on a liquid coolant and a lot of maintenance attention
Even assuming we’ll be able to mine ice, it’s not something we can rely on to power a base, and we haven’t yet figured out how

So, if we can develop a small fission reactor that never needs any attention, can work in lower gravity, no atmosphere, huge range of temperatures , and doesn’t have anything that can leak, boil, or freeze, that would be perfect

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My personal favourite is orbital solar. With no atmosphere, it should be doable. But of course it's just as hypothetical as all the other options at this point.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Then beam the energy to Luna? Or could we transfer batteries?

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How do we get all the materials and tools for the constructions up there to begin with? And how do we supply the base with Oxygen, food, water, etc?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sure, there’s lots of questions needed to be answered

transportation is in progress. Everyone must have heard about Artemis andStarShip: one or both are planned to get you there, plus I believe SpaceX has a contract for a lander
maybe you heard the excitement over discovering ice. With sufficient power, the hope is they can make their own water, oxygen, rocket fuel
there have been quite a few experiments in ISS with growing plants. Hopefully they can grow at least some of their own

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah we just haven’t done it yet. Just like you and I are capable of writing books, we just haven’t yet.

I can’t think of any tech we’re lacking to build massive space infrastructure honestly.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

A theme park with blackjack and hookers. In fact, forget the blackjack. And the theme park