this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

2843 readers
114 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pissnpink@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I mean, i get the idea of the comic, but i don't know if i agree with the "incremental change" sign. In my experience things change gradually then all at once. Incremental change is usually a part of the process.

Republicans didn't kill Roe all at once, it was a series of wins and losses over years until suddenly they were in a position to strip away rights from women.

[–] j_roby@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I see what you're saying... But, you don't start your negotiation by asking for incremental change. To continue on your analogy, the anti-abortion activists have been demanding a full stop to it up-front since they started...

Change may sometimes only happen incrementally, but nothing worthwhile will happen if that's all that's asked for.

[–] thedevisinthedetails@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Ohh so your comic is false then and activists don't ask for incremental change?

Or it's false and they do incremental change on the way to getting their demands met?

Quit blaming and demoralizing your own side.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

No dumbass, he's trying to HELP his side by making them not roll over before real negotiations have even started.

If you want your side to win, stop cheering when they lose, loser.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)