this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)
Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )
5677 readers
32 users here now
Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No piracy
Other Football/Soccer Related Communities
- Eredivisie
- MLS
- Football Manager
- Ajax FC
- Arsenal FC
- Chelsea FC
- Liverpool FC
- Tottenham Hotspur FC
- US National Woman’s Soccer League
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
OK so this isn't easy to answer.
First off, we haven't spent that much up until these past few years, and even then it's not like we are outspending everyone around us by a huge margin. In fact Newcastle, Nottingham, West Ham, and Man U all had higher net spends in 22/23 and we only spent 25m more than Tottenham.
Second, up until recently our wage bill was low compared to other top 6 teams and we are now 4 just behind Liverpool. This gave us a little more freedom to spend on fees and we weren't paying high wages.
Third, we have that sweet CL money. This extra income will allow us to spend a little more freely then we have in the past.
Lastly. United have spent close to 1b in transfers over the last decade and the owners are siphoning money out of club, whereas our owners are injecting money back into the club. As far as I'm aware all of the other teams owned by the Kroenke's have won championships lately and we are the only one who hasn't. It's in their best interest to ensure their investment continues its on field success so that the value of the team can continue to grow as well.