this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
701 points (97.6% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9899 readers
171 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Ah, gen Z

Us millenials tried that. It was called Occupy Wall Street and we got tear gassed, beaten, and driven away. And then there was a massive effort to erase what they could from media and history, and tarnish the rest.

It was a massive turning point for our generation. It broke us. We went from angry to depressed. We couldn't beat them. They have the power of massive physical violence behind them, AND control of the media.

Gen Z is trying via unionization, which is a tactic much more likely to succeed. Don't try to overthrow those in power, they're too powerful for that. Build up your own power first in whatever manner possible, and then use their own levers of control against them.

Unions need to make a move on the media next. Shawn Fein has been very good at this but it needs more action.

[–] buzziebee@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Occupy Wall Street started strong but quickly decended into uncoordinated nonsense. The initial message was simple, popular, and actionable about how it's bullshit that global austerity and government cutbacks were hurting the 99% whilst the 1% who caused the crash got off scott free with massive bailouts and tax cuts.

Because it was a "leaderless" collective action it quickly got occupied itself by all sorts of weird and wacky movements who diluted the message and gave the right wing media all the ammo they could ever want to paint the whole thing as "just some crazy hippies chatting shit about communism" or whatever.

It's pretty typical of movements on the left unfortunately. Everyone wants to be super inclusive so all ideas are equally important and you can't just dismiss ideas as not being relevant without creating a load of infighting. The alternative however means people with bad ideas (ones who often have more time and energy to boot) can easily take over the conversation and your whole message gets diluted, confused, and easily disarmed by the media.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think the left's problem isn't inclusiveness (in things like this) it's the inability to give power to "strong" leadership. The same mental firewalls that prevent those on the left from falling victim to mountebanks keeps them from letting others speak on their behalf.

It also creates mental roadblocks for anyone on the left who tries to lead. "How can I speak for these people? I am not one of them." That's not a limitation of inclusiveness it's just empathy. So when anyone on the left challenges a left wing leader with anything, really that leader--if they are truly left leaning--will not fight back without near certainty about their position.

This makes it easy for a left wing leader to denounce the illogical and/or racist positions from those on the right but extremely difficult to take a stand on issues where everything sucks like Israeli/Palestinian conflict or immigration. This leaves them open for charlatans to point to them and say, "See? They're weak!" Which is the exact thing the right hates and fears from left wing leaders.

[–] buzziebee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Maybe inclusiveness wasn't the right word to use, but your second and third paragraphs are exactly what I meant. It's because we want to make sure everyone's voices are hard and ideas are considered that movements end up standing for everything and nothing at the same time. To me creating that space and opportunity for all ideas and people is inclusivity, which is a great thing overall but can make affecting change difficult when your opposition all fall into line behind "strong" leaders.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We need a raised militia in open, violent rebellion against the police and national guard. Anything less than that is theater.

[–] aphonefriend@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I hear Texas is already on it.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lol I'm a millennial too I definitely remember that and it's not what I'm talking about at all. They just stood around yelling for the most part.