Asklemmy

43382 readers

2052 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Is there a scientific ,logical or theoratical answer to the "what comes first chicken or egg question ? I know it's suppposed to be a paradox but i wanted to know if there is one. if there is share ? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by THEDAEMON@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

EDIT : It seems as no one understood what i was talking about and maybe its my fault for not elaborating . I always thought chicken was a metaphor for this paradox and not really meaning chicken as a specific spiece . So my question is how did the ancestor of chicken came to be if it was born (egg) wouldn't it need a parent or if it was a parent (chicken ) woudn't it need to be born ? Or did all the creatures start out as bacteria and climbed out from ocean through evalution if so why isn't any new species being born this way or am i missing something ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] the_q@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

So if the mother was genetically different enough to be called a different species then...say it with me... the chicken came first.

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

No, that's not right. The species transitioned from the proto-chicken to the chicken. Whichever specific individual we call the first chicken started off as (say it with me) an egg. The mother's offspring was different enough to be the first chicken.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Eggs existed long before the chicken, or the species that gave birth to the chicken. What's in that egg doesn't matter, when it's the latest in a long line of eggs, the contents of this egg can't precede eggs.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But you don't know if the proto chicken's offspring is a different kind of chicken until it's hatched. That's how you get a new species.

It's a bit of a Schrodinger's egg situation I guess.

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago

For what it's worth it's possible to test the contents of an egg, but it's moot because it doesn't actually matter when we know. It exists independent of observation.

[–] Zellith@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

Species is just a thing we use because we like to put things in boxes. It's all just transitions. The life between species could be described as it's own species if we shifted the scale. Again, boxes.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The baby chicken in the egg is the same chicken that hatches from the egg, but we call it an egg until it hatches. Egg first.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You don't know what's in the egg until it hatches.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

so true, it could be bees for all we know.