this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
283 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
633 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New evidence strongly suggests that OceanGate's submersible, which imploded and killed all passengers on its way to the Titanic wreck, was unfit for the journey. The CEO, Stockton Rush, bought discounted carbon fiber past its shelf life from Boeing, which experts say is a terrible choice for a deep-sea vessel. This likely played a role in the submersible's tragic demise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 52 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think most billionaires have a bit of their brain set to believe in themselves rather more than is warranted. It's great for making money, but maybe not something you want to put your life on the line over.

[–] ollien@beehaw.org 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think it scratches a similar itch as most techbros: "if I can solve this hard problem, all problems are easy!" It's a mentality I see constantly, especially on the orange site.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Problem: exists for decades and has not been solved by experts with tons of funding in all that time.

Redditor with zero knowledge or context: Why don't they just do X, Y, Z? It's so easy 😏

[–] beefcat@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

In this case, the problem was solved over 60 years ago. This billionaire decided to reject the tried and tested solution and came up with their own.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

I like asking the "why don't they..." question as a genuine question because it's a great way to learn a lot in a short time

[–] cassetti@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's worse than that. They're narcissistic and think they have the answer to every problem. I worked for a boss like this who had Aspergers syndrome (undiagnosed, but clear case)

He literally had bumper stickers made up with "[his name] is the answer" - he wasn't joking. If there ever was a problem he would immediately solve the problem in his mind, and that was the way we MUST do it. He would not accept rationalization as to why that might be a bad idea. I learned real fast not to tell him we had a problem.... until I already had a proposal, who was involved, and costs involved to fix the problem before he had a chance to solve the problem himself.

[–] DarkWasp@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As someone on the autism spectrum myself, we’re usually fairly open to whatever the facts are whether that disproves us or not. There’s a lot of overlap at times between narcissistic traits and autism, are you sure he just wasn’t a narcissist? I say that because refusing to accept the rationalization of what may be a bad idea just sounds dumb. (The bumper stickers made stand out to me too).

Alternatively he was just someone with autism who is narcissistic and dumb, who refused to accept any new information that countered what he had settled on.

[–] cassetti@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I worked with him for 13 years, I wasn't the only one who saw the classic traits

  • Difficulty in reading other’s feelings
  • Aggressive behavior (childishly would throw his keyboard or trashcan across the room during meetings when unhappy with the answers he got)
  • Clumsy muscle coordination
  • Inability to perceive gestures by coworkers
  • Lack of social awareness

The list goes on and on. But needless to say he refused to accept he might have been on the spectrum or get tested despite suggestions by fellow staff members who also dealt with his irrational outbursts on a daily basis

[–] May@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I think is just that it depends on the person, like some ppl might be less open than others bc thats just how they are whether or not they were ND. Maybe thats just how hise personality is or how his traits manifest

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

especially on the orange site.

Hacker News can be so engaging, but then you go to the comments and it's so enraging.

[–] dipbeneaththelasers@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a study done on this kind of mentality. Researches invited pairs of players and before each game flipped a coin to designate one player rich and the other poor. The rich player was then given more money and an easier set of rules. At the end of the game they interviewed the player that inevitably won, and in all cases the players reported that they won because of key decisions they made while playing. Not one mentioned they got lucky with the coin flip.

Summary and interview with a researcher: https://www.marketplace.org/2021/01/19/why-rich-people-tend-think-they-deserve-their-money/amp/

Study (pdf): https://studenttheses.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2661526/view

[–] swope@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised this isn't a named sort of cognitive bias. I think there's a related thing where we humans tend to cite external causes outside our control when we are unfortunate or make mistakes, and we tend to cite our own virtues when we are fortunate and successful.

[–] shiftenter@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think this would be considered Self-serving bias.

[–] Jo@readit.buzz 6 points 1 year ago

but maybe not something you want to put your life on the line over.

To be fair, their hubris usually only kills poor people so, progress?

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It's implicit bias.

Our forefathers has orchestrated a world of scarcity. They raised us telling us how America is in overwheming, inescapable debt (even though that debt is a useful byproduct of our financial excess and has no deleterious effects on our future) and how everything will always cost something and how we are fools for ever thinking anything could be better than this, right?

After living through that, if you become a billionaire you must feel like you are by and large exempted from those rules.

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

A bit of the 'it wont happen to me' mindset.