Linux

48331 readers

666 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

1173

Some of y'all need to see this and drop the superiority complex... (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by 13617@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

201 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Image shows a tweet with the header "and people STILL try to convince me Linux and Windows are better when the DATA clearly shows otherwise. SMH" with an image attached showing the following:

"Operating systems by current version" Mac OS: 14 Windows: 11 Linux: 6

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 82 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

This, but unironically used as a marketing trick:

There was no v1 of Oracle Database, as co-founder Larry Ellison "knew no one would want to buy version 1"

That's why the first Oracle database is v2.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Database

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

this is what happened to windows 9, too.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

No, the problem with Windows 9 is that a lot of things compared the version with 9* as a catch all for windows 95 and 98, so they were worried with backwards compatibility.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 15 points 10 months ago

There wasn't a Windows 9 because a lot of (poorly) written software will do a system check for Windows version and if the first number is "9", it won't work and complain that you need to be using a Windows OS newer than Windows 9x (95/98).

It was just for backwards compatibility more than anything.

[–] juja@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What’s wrong with 9 though ? Didn’t iPhone also skip 9 ?

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

After the X/XS/XR phones they went to the 11. If the XS was 10 then the X would be 9. It is a bit weird for them to do 8 and 9 at the same time, though.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

but the X is a Roman numeral hence why Apple demands that OSX be pronounced as "OS ten"

(I have not heard anyone who is not an Apple employee call it that but it's the official stance, you can look it up)

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Dunno. But that’s a hardware model, ;)

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's a fun fact

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Slackware went from version 4 to 7 for a similar reason. But IIRC its reason was RedHat.