this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
85 points (76.4% liked)
Technology
58070 readers
2799 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe. I doubt anyone is accusing Musk of specifically being okay with CSAM on his website.
The more likely accusation is that staffing problems at X—in the form of raw number of employees as well as employee morale and anything else contributing to how much work gets done—are so severe that more CSAM is getting through, and staying up, for longer than before.
Didn't he unban and stick up for somebody who posted CSAM to the site? (I'll try and find the article with it, if anybody else knows what it is feel free to reply with it).
Edit: Here it is
Non-Paywall version
There's something seriously wrong with our communication infrastructure if some rich nutjob can just buy up an important piece of it and run it into the ground like this. This could've never happened if Twitter were a worker-owned collective. Chalk another one up for capitalism.
Or if it were a federated platform made up of different instances with their own different business models and corporate structures.
But of course, federation and interoperability doesn't work well with capitalist goals, so it's still to blame either way.