this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
456 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18850 readers
4899 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 107 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What bullshit is this? So any president can engage in insurrection as recognized by a court completely unpunished as long as they aren’t an officer in the military and “only a civilian”? Maybe this legal system does deserve to be burned to the ground if it’s that ignorant.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 10 months ago (4 children)

So any president can engage in insurrection as recognized by a court completely unpunished as long as they aren’t an officer in the military and “only a civilian”?

It's even weirder, because she is saying this phrase, "any office, civil or military, under the United States” does not cover the office of the president. Which is a terrible ruling as the president is a civilian officer and thus covered by section 3 of the Fourteenth amendment. The ruling comes off as a blatant misreading of the text.

Maybe this legal system does deserve to be burned to the ground if it’s that ignorant.

Our government is being infiltrated by fascists at all levels. We need to vote the fascists out.

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you need to take a lot more drastic action than just voting, because your options are fascists or polite fascists

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

because your options are fascists or polite fascists

The Republican party is controlled by fascists. The Democratic party is controlled by neoliberals. Neoliberalism leads to fascism. That does not mean that neoliberals are themselves fascists. Neoliberals have simply failed to realize that their idealized society, if left to rot long enough, is the ideal environment for fascism to take root.

This distinction is important, because if we incorrectly write off neoliberals as fascists we are doing the fascists work for them by dividing ourselves needlessly. The truth is, we outnumber the fascists. In order to win, the fascists need us to see each other as the enemy. Instead of lumping everyone to the right of us politically with the fascists, we need to educate people about the dangers of neoliberalism and fascism.

We are in a race to educate and inform people. The answers to our problems are democracy and socialism. We need to spread that message to as many people as possible, before the fascists spread their message of division and hatred. The fascists have a head start, so we have no time to lose. edit: typo

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don’t get why these people say that both parties are fascist because I entirely agree that while Dems in the long term become similar, just with different values, it’s unclear to me how that muddies the political waters.

What people seem to be saying is that even if I vote left every time and even if leftist ideas take more hold, the right will still exist and both parties will swing us right regardless.

I fundamentally disagree. The very very first thing we have to do is make the current state of the right deeply unpopular. What I want to hear is far more Dems saying “this party has gone too far left, I’m republican now” and purifying the left by leaving. I want Dems and republicans competing in that way where conservative Dems slowly bleed to the other side. And then we vote further and further left until we become sensible.

Do I see that happening? Absolutely. But this next point is critical. I realize the meme about every election being critical. But this one truly is. America decides in a year: Fascism or no?

But I’d argue this election isn’t as important as the ones after it. Even if America re-elects trump, he can only do so much to slide us toward fascism(not to minimize). But if his re-election doesn’t cause outrage and huge political shifts, we’re doomed. Two republican victories in a row and this country topples in a big way.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

But I’d argue this election isn’t as important as the ones after it. Even if America re-elects trump, he can only do so much to slide us toward fascism(not to minimize). But if his re-election doesn’t cause outrage and huge political shifts, we’re doomed. Two republican victories in a row and this country topples in a big way.

I can't overstate how nice it is to see a hopeful opinion for a change. You are correct that it could take two elections for the fascists to takeover. The issue is that they could do it in one in theory.

If they win back the senate and take the executive branch in the next election they will control all three branches of the Federal Government. Trump has threatened to use the Insurrection Act to mobilize the military against civilians. Also, the Republicans are championing this Project 2025 from the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. Among other things, it calls for removing every nonpartisan member of the executive branch and replacing them with partisan yes-men who are only loyal to Trump.

https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/project-2025

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

civil or military

Even more confused.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's an inclusive or. In the US, if a member of the civilian government or the military engages in insurrection or rebellion they are ineligible from holding any office again.

When the word 'office' is first mentioned in section 3, 'civil or military' is specified. It's clear then that 'officer of the United States' has the same connotation.

An insurrectionist, who took an oath of office, is disqualified from assuming the office of the president and an insurrectionist will be disqualified from holding any office if they committed their insurrection while being president.

Here is the full section:

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Here is a link to the fourteenth amendment for reference.

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/14th-amendment

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Oh I was clear on that after your first reply, just confused how that ruling could have possibly occurred given all the text and the actions by Trump. If she were in his pocket, she wouldn’t have acknowledged he engaged in insurrection in the first place, so WTAF, judge?

edit: like… did he cross his fingers behind his back when he took the oath of office for president, so it didn’t count? What the actual hell.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't know if you've read this comic, but I would say the judge believes in the message around the red, bottom left hand circle, on the second page, very strongly.

https://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots1138.html

Also like, spoilers I guess, if you do read the comic and are behind.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know how to spell it but there’s a Marge Simpson aggravated noise in my head right now.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

It's some hardcore lawful evil nonsense.

[–] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 2 points 10 months ago

Lmao, I had to check which board I was on for a second.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Our government is being infiltrated by fascists at all levels. We need to vote the fascists out.

~Germans, 1920

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, we need to vote the fascists out of office. Otherwise we will end up like Nazi Germany.

I'm not going to assume. What do you mean?

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean germans who didnt like hitler might have had faith in democracy a little bit too long.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In a true democracy, people have the ability to throw their democracy away. Hitler won an election to gain power. He was able to do that in part because Fascism was an entirely new political ideology then.

We have the advantage of knowing better. The trick is getting everyone to identify Trump as the fascist he is. Our democracy is only as strong as we are all informed.

It is of course too late for voting once the fascists complete their takeover. Thankfully that hasn't happened yet.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In a true democracy we wouldn’t be limited to voting for wealthy individuals who had been in power all their lives. This is oligarhy with elements that keep kids beliving they have some kind of freeer freedom than people in the past. There is hardly anything democratic about a party convention deciding who the population will even have a chance to vote for.

We have the advantage of knowing better.

Tell that to MAGA idiots who are gonna vote for Trump again. It doesn’t concern them that we are worried. We cannot protect them from their own stupidity. Even if we try the system is rigged by the rich who rather exploit their stupidity for more money and power than protect them from stupid things they are bound to do.

Remember, there is no justice for trumps extremely illegal and undemocratic behavior simply because the rich and powerful decided he might still be useful.

In short the democracy they keep telling us we live in is a facade to a system where few make the choices that matter and leave the illusion of choice to the many to keep them docile. We make them rich and they make us suffer.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Tell that to MAGA idiots who are gonna vote for Trump again.

Helping people to stop being fascists is a good thing. We are going to need to get on that too. But at this point, there are still so many people who haven't fully realized what is going on yet.

In short the democracy they keep telling us we live in is a facade to a system where few make the choices that matter and leave the illusion of choice to the many to keep them docile.

I'm aware that the wealthy have a disproportionate influence in our democracy. But we will still have a democracy. If the fascists win any of the next elections our democracy will be an illusion. The oligarchy of tech giants will be in complete control of our lives under the guidance of a christofascist state.

We make them rich and they make us suffer.

They can make it worse if we lose our democracy. While we can only make it better with our democracy.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think historically we made things better by revolting, not by democracy and I don’t think this time will be different.

I hope you’re right though, I’m still voting in my country but I don’t think I believe in good will of any of the sides. If lesser evil is our only option we’ll still eventually end up in hell.

In order to make this society better we’d need to change so many things it would basically be a whole 180. For one we’d need to fix public education, but in every country I know of it has been only eroding over the decades. Instead all the money goes to the elites and the proletariat gets dumber and dumber, to the point of electing fascists. What’s the point of voting „left” if the „left” still takes a piss on public schools and teachers? If not this election or the next, the nutters are gonna (democratically) win eventually.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

In the US, we are going to be one election away from a fascist takeover for a while. We are circling the fascist drain. The point is we can have a better future, but only if we fight for it with the tools at our disposal. With voting, protesting, and spreading good information. Our only chance is to vote in Democrats and independents on the left like Bernie.

If the fascists takeover there are no guarantees. Even if a revolution succeeded there is no guarantee what we would get. Revolutions can just as easily cause a country to go from dictatorship to democracy as they can cause a country to go from dictatorship to dictatorship.