this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
720 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59288 readers
6554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In my native country gigabit fiber internet is less than $9/mo. Broadband prices in the US are absolutely ridiculous.

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

50€ for 1000/1000 here. My employer covers it.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I pay $110 for 2000/2000 fiber. In the US.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

I pay $110 for 300mbs down 10 mbs up, in New York City. I have routine fantasies about what the board of my ISP deserves.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

46€ for the same here.

30€ if I can do with 1000/100 instead, which most people could.

[–] Huschke@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

49€ here, but yeah about 1/10 of the price of some US states is insane.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 1 points 1 year ago

30€/m for 2x2.5Gb

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I pay Comcast $130 for 1000/35

Just Internet, no bundles.

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you can get the same internet speed for like 10$ in Ukraine. of 4$ for symmetrical 100mbps fiber connection

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to defend those shitbags, but population density plays a large part in infrastructure cost. source

Granted, they've alco received enormous subsidies without intending to fulfill their obligations, but still, it's a significant factor. This country is quite large. I can drive 4h in nearly any direction and still be in state lines. Most of that is farm land.

This is one of the reasons why this should be nationalized because rural areas are still either unserved or underserved by broadband because the cost/benefit analysis doesn't favor the provider enough.

That said, prices are higher than they should be even taking density into account (strictly my opinion). Gigabit fiber should actually be about $15/mo for all regions, (my SWAG*) but the infrastructure just is not there yet. The biggest challenge being the "last mile".

*Sophisticated wild-ass guess

[–] automattable@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Don’t let them tell you it’s the lack of density that is the problem. I live in a major US city with high density, and there is only one provider that offers actual broadband at my address (~$100/mo for 500Mb/s service). The “competition” wants me to pay $50/mo for 20 Megabit DSL.