this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
1608 points (99.9% liked)

196

16553 readers
2771 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ser_Salty@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shot doesn't mean dead and one person can receive multiple gunshot wounds in a year.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

There's just one poor unlucky guy who drives the average up. Keeps surviving though

[–] zepheriths@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That still means everyone in the US is shot in just over a year. That's not right

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Still, 90% of the population isn't getting shot every year and a couple of people aren't going to make up for it with multiple gunshot wounds.

That being said, whatever the real percentage is, it's still too high

[–] Ser_Salty@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, yes, 1 in 400 is still the wrong proportion, but I guess you can't say a quarter of a person is shot every 8 months or whatever it would be, if you're just trying to make a quick and concise point.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why choose 400 people, or why include the shooting stat once they went with 400? The number would very much round down to zero, and the post says at least 1 person per day which means that's the lower bound

[–] Ser_Salty@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

How would I know? I didn't make the post. What if they based it off of a very specific day where a lot of people got shot?