this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
332 points (91.1% liked)

World News

39390 readers
2386 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hamas and Netanyahus rhetoric; name a more iconic due.

These fuckers fit hand and fucking glove.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Netanyahu: Hamas is a terrorist organization that wants to eliminate the Jewish nation

Hamas: yeah he’s right

[–] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why Nethanyahu funded them.

All his investments paid off in this neat little casus belli.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He allowed Hamas to be funded but it's still horrific the hand he had in making this monster. He allowed Hamas to grow so it would fight those looking to negotiate toward a two-state solution.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Both of them have caused so much harm.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Like a well oiled meat grinder.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Netanyahu does not state that killing of civilians is his goal, nor does IDF purposely do that. Imagine the amount of civilian deaths if it were actually IDF’s goal, as it is for Hamas.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your argument might have more weight if the head of national security wasn't a former member of the Kach party, a group Israel designated a terrorist group in 1994.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"When he came of age for conscription into the Israel Defense Forces at 18, he was exempted from service by the IDF due to his extreme-right political background."

What a guy. I thought militaries (and police) love those people.

[–] DanL4@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Israeli military is not for volunteers, it's for everyone. The top ranking generals and chiefs of staff were prominent against Netanyahu and this extremist incompetent government. They are also said that human rights activists that give a voice to solders that saw atrocious acts of the idf itself. This is not the norm, contrary to what the media would have you think. This, according to the top ranking Israeli ex officers, is how the idf should fix its wrongs.

But they kill plenty anyway.

Oops?

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is an important distinction in my opinion. Does the IDF care if they kill palestinian civilians? No. But they aren't actively trying to murder as many palestinian civilians as they can either.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Being so incredibly nonchalant about killing civilians as the IDF is it's almost an insignificant difference imo.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They aren't? So why did they bomb Jabalia twice?

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Quick update, they bombed it a third time today

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How should I know. What I do know however is that if the IDF wanted, they could kill many more Gazans.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Seriously look at their actions and decide for yourself whether or not they are going out of their way to kill civilians or whether they are so careless they kill anyone on their way

The idea that the IDF would have to beat Gaza into a pulp so we can finally admit to ourselves that they don't care about civilians is weak, not to mention a logical fallacy. This isn't the indication to look for when war crimes happen. It's the actions of the IDF themselves.

Just look at all the times Israel told civilians to move to one place them bombed the shit out of the place.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe they just want plausible deniability more than they want immediate genocide. It sure looks to me like that's what they're doing, and that it's working.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Hamas has used it as a base for decades…

Just like every other piece of civilian infrastructure.

You say Jabalia like it hasn’t been a city since the 40s. It’s not some tent city. It’s a legitimate city that has been around for decades, which Hamas only took control of after 2007.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes totally, that is enough excuse to shoot dead over a hundred people and wound hundreds more.

Tents or not, you're basically saying Israel bombed a crowded area and I'm afraid they are losing this one in the media. 😊

It's a refugee camp because people who live there are more victims of Israeli displacement.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s not a refugee camp at all. It’s a city that has existed for almost a century.

You can cheer for Hamas. Your emojis don’t mean shit lol. Nobody else supports them. Even “the media” (you sound like my drug addicted religious dad here).

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

what a shill. no where did the above comment support Hammas.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

First, I didn't cheer for Hamas.

Also, That area is still a refugee camp. You are confusing Jabalia city with the Jabalia refugee camp.. It's okay to be wrong, you just have to admit it to yourself.

And the very fact that somehow bombing people taking refuge in a city rather than a refigee camp is something you needed to point out as though that changes anything ... That's very telling.

And lastly, Israel is losing the media war. 😊 It's not sustainable to kill more people and get away with it, not when even holocaust historians are alarmed at the Israeli rhetoric and massacre it keeps committing on a daily basis.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jabalia Refugee Camp was established in 1948.

It's not a temporary housing measure. The buildings are all high-density multi-family dwellings constructed from reinforced concrete.

Calling it a refugee camp cheapens the word for people who are displaced from their homes and forced into temporary housing during a war.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's still a refugee camp. It houses refugees who have been displaced. Many Palestinian refugee camps are X number of years old because Israel has been ethnically cleansing them for decades. It doesn't matter how you define it, no one "made shit up", it's classed as a refugee camp. The UN set it up as a camp, but here comes some random regular jackoff on lemmy trying to tell us otherwise.

The audacity of pro-Israelis in twisting all international definitions is beyond me.

Again, the very fact that it's been a refugee camp for decades where people have shitty living conditions makes this bombing that Israel did worse, not better.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The people living in that camp were done dirty by the 1949 armistice, don't get me wrong. But it's been 75 years; they need to move on.

Palestinians are literally the only refugees on the planet who pass down refugee status to their children. That's based on the definition that the UN made up because the Arab countries didn't want to take in Palestinians.

They've had 75 years to move out of that camp and make their own lives better. At some point, they need wipe the snot off their noses and stop crying. The Jews who were ethnically cleansed from the Arab countries faced adversity when they moved to Israel, but they've moved on and made their lives much better.

@steventhedev @snek Oh wait, I misspoke, the "Jews" of the 1940's didn't have a "historical" connection to the last, they only had a RELIGIOUS connection to the land. Religion doesn't convey physical property rights, so talk about making shit up.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's called the right of return. That's what you get when you create an apartheid state that does ethnic cleansing for breakfast.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's wonderful to see you agree that Arab Jews also have a right of return, and deserve reparations for their stolen assets during the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Muslim countries

EDIT: I'm trolling you with this comment, but I feel a little bad about it. Let's just agree to disagree and take the rest of the day to cool off

[–] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Of course they do. What happened during that time was wrong.

I'm trolling you with this comment, but I feel a little bad about it. Let's just agree to disagree and take the rest of the day to cool off

I think you mostly talk out of your ass, but that's okay.

@steventhedev @snek The Jews didn't "move on" , they literally created "Zionism" and STOLE land they had only a mere historical connection to. Your entire post was completely delusional

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Jabalia refugee camp consists of an area that is 1,4 km^2^. It had a registered population of about 50 000 inhabitants in 2017, who knows how much these days. It's not exactly a small place, even if the term "refugee camp" might give that image.

So who knows. Perhaps they're just murdering civilians, or perhaps a place like that is a perfect breeding ground for extremism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabalia_refugee_camp

[–] snek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. Israel bombed a giant refugee camp. How is this helping Israel's case?

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, as -- believe it or not -- I'm not part of IDF. But you can of course wonder: are they fighting a popularity war or an actual one?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Well, I, for one, hope that the IDF is finally fucking losing the popularity war. Until the US stops propping them up no matter what, they have no incentive to seriously work towards peace.

If they were fighting an actual war, then the leaders of Israel would be pulled into the ICC for war crimes.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hurricane of shit meeting tornado of blood

(bars)