this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
168 points (95.2% liked)

Android

17648 readers
59 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Good to see minor battery life improvements to the Pixel Watch 2. Hopefully that upgraded heart rate sensor is actually accurate.

https://youtu.be/TVGk48jcdtg

Pixel Watch was embarrassingly bad in health tracking compared to the Apple Watch SE. It's cheaper to get an Apple Watch SE + (discounted) iPhone than just a Pixel Watch.

And please get rid of the Fitbit subscription, Google.

[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup, I considered the pixel watch for my android phone but Garmin has an advantage over it in every category while having no subscription. I would have considered an apple watch if it were compatible with android.

I think the pixel watch is doomed to fail unless they can separate from the Fitbit model and continue to improve the hardware and software.

[–] Cheesus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still wouldn't consider an apple watch over a Garmin. Apple/Google/Samsung need to get their battery life on par with Garmin.

[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree, after owning Garmin watches I wouldn't want an apple watch.

[–] Blxter@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

had no idea Google owned Fitbit. But looks like you don't miss out on many features by not subscribing to the Fitbit pro thing. Could be wrong. But Yea screw a Fitbit subscription.

[–] ijeff@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They moved detailed sleep tracking insights under the subscription model. It's pretty disappointing.

[–] Blxter@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would be the difference (if there is one) from the detailed sleep tracking and non detailed version?

[–] ijeff@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago

Sleep phase details, which can be useful for monitoring sleep quality over time.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't stand sleeping with a watch on so not getting the sub hasn't bothered me a bit.

[–] ijeff@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting! My smart watches are almost solely for sleep tracking and are used mostly as regular time pieces during the day.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I use my smart watch for 3 features

  1. As a watch
  2. For notifications
  3. For sleep tracking

I don't really do any sports, but it's nice to know how many steps I took today and how far I walked. (it's between 100m-20km per day)

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/TVGk48jcdtg

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Welp_im_damned@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the link! yeah thats a shame about the health tracking

[–] ink@r.nf 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

do you trust that guy because he calls himself a scientist or because he has fancy graphs, maybe his accent? hmm… must be the lab dress shown for 5 seconds in the intro.

I saw both of his videos where he compares pixel watch and apple watch against polar h10 chest strap as a reference device, but somehow the reference device is ranked lower than apple device in his pixel watch ratings? How does that happen?

how does a reference device wind up being less accurate against the device you are testing against? I couldn't find him testing them against an actual medical equipment.

Him comparing Apple watch against Polar H10: https://i.ibb.co/MnSJXR1/image.png

His ranking when testing Google pixel watch where polar h10 is less accurate?: https://i.ibb.co/Xt9hS4J/image.png

Google is shit at hardware and nobody wants a subscription for a watch but maybe, just maybe, this guy seems like a apple fanboy?

The guy doesn't reveal his data or the code he uses to plot the graphs, just 100s and 100s of affiliate links. How the hell people consider this scientific and why the fuck is it so popular?

I'm no scientist but I don't know. educate me

[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He reviewed a second Polar H10 strap, which is why it was on the chart. https://youtu.be/6F_RccP7Ec0

It does seem to have been removed from newer videos. It's not in the Apple Watch Series 9 review.

Regarding the accuracy of the Polar H10 strap itself: https://youtu.be/YGMZNF7Lnmo

Regarding comparing with actual scientific tests: https://youtu.be/7m_oBiYk8Rk he only does it for devices with significance, it seems.

It's not a perfect series of tests since the subject is only him, but he's clear about it and it's above and beyond what regular tech reviewers do, who gloss over spec sheets.

These are the kinds of reviews I personally value.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/6F_RccP7Ec0

https://piped.video/YGMZNF7Lnmo

https://piped.video/7m_oBiYk8Rk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.