this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1111 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm not one to be all doom and gloom about ai, but giving one its own small nuclear reactor, presumably one that's in close proximity to it and separate from the local power grid... that's obviously going to have substantial security measures around it... and be that much more difficult to cut off if need be....

I mean, it's starting to sound a lot like an unbelievable plot hole in a bad sci fi movie isn't it?

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's.... Not how things work. Creative, but no.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

You're gonna be reductive about it as if AI hasn't ALREADY USED TASKRABBIT TO TRICK A HUMAN INTO SOLVING A CAPTCHA???

GPT has already neutralized our primary defence, it can now do anything.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a nice sci-fi thought, but also not really how it works irl.

Physical proximity is not really a factor here.

There's a lot more going on at all levels that makes this absurd at best. Movies are not a good representation of reality, they can't be if they are meant to be entertaining.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Why are you saying this as if the AI would have control over the reactor.

It's unlikely they'd even be in the same building, or even the same campus. We have these crazy things called "wires" that let us transmit a lot of power over distances, so your small nuclear reactor can be remote, safe and secure and your AI lab can just be on your main campus.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They should call it WOPR for no reason whatsoever.

Anyone fancy a nice game of chess?

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Ironic you compare it to a bad sci fi movie and that's exactly where your knowledge is coming from.

[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You do konw, that it is IMPOSSIBLE for a nuclear reactor to explode in a nuclear fission explosion, aka become a nuclear bomb. Reaching critical mass isn't possible. Nuclear reactors can catch on fire, if built using graphite, that isn't done anymore, or have a steam explosion. but that's it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They can also get hot enough to melt the metallic components (including the fuel itself) if the reaction isn't properly regulated (hence, "meltdown"), but you're correct that that's still not a fission explosion.