this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
941 points (97.6% liked)

Ukraine

8301 readers
569 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CarlG@esq.social 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

@Wilshire I cannot think of a time in recent history when we have gotten more bang for our military buck than supporting #Ukraine against #Russia .

Not only are we doing the right thing by helping a democratic nation fight an invasion by an expansionist regime, but this aid has helped weaken one of our two main adversaries, and serves as a warning to China.

This is truly one of those win/win situations where the only debate should be the degree of military aid, not whether we support Ukraine.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Besides. Ukraine gave up nukes because we promised to protect them. There's a tremendous cost to going back on our word for soooo many reasons.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We didn't promise to protect them. But Russia and the US both promised not to invade.

Of course, we should still help them because it's the right thing to do AND is harmful to our average.

But I do think the worst thing about this war from a geopolitics standpoint is Russia going back on its word. They've essentially proven that no nation should ever give up their nukes.

[–] AssPennies@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

no nation should ever give up their nukes

No nation within invasion distance of Russia, anyway.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I feel like that was a huge oversight of the Budapest memorandum. You get promises that the two global powers would not invade you, but you get nobody to actually enforce it. And Russia showed that those promises are empty. I get that having guarantees to defend opens another can of worms, but it's probably better than the situation we're in now where we're now unlikely to see anyone else give up nukes.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's not win/win....if you're Russia 😂

[–] uis@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am from Russia and I say it win/win/win for USA, Ukraine and Russia.

"I'm rooting for you[ukrainians], because Ukraine's victory is Russia's chance",

"You are fighting and dying for them[Putin and oligarchs], not for Russia",

"This is not war of Russia and Ukraine. I am against such definition. This is Putin's war."

- Boris Nemtsov, before he was shot on bridge near Kremlin wall

[–] Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...Or one of the Russian owned GOP congressmen

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They helpfully have (R) by their name.