this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
510 points (94.6% liked)

News

23284 readers
4791 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden will announce the creation of the first-ever federal office of gun violence prevention on Friday, fulfilling a key demand of gun safety activists as legislation remains stalled in Congress, according to two people with direct knowledge of the White House’s plans.

Stefanie Feldman, a longtime Biden aide who previously worked on the Domestic Policy Council, will play a leading role, the people said.

Greg Jackson, executive director of the Community Justice Action Fund, and Rob Wilcox, the senior director for federal government affairs at Everytown for Gun Safety, are expected to hold key roles in the office alongside Feldman, who has worked on gun policy for more than a decade and still oversees the policy portfolio at the White House. The creation of the office was first reported by The Washington Post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3, 2, 1...here come the gun nuts...

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As expected every time guns are brought up in a political context, the comments are already full of people talking past each other while ignoring the real issues.

It is exactly as difficult to get rid of guns in this country as it would be to get rid of the electoral college, and the electoral college has done thing like lead directly to the covid pandemic being far worse than it had to be because Trump fired the guy we had in position to warn everyone if China leaked a pandemic.

Instead of discussing that, all you're going to find in a thread like this is back and forth about getting rid of guns (nearly impossible) or decrying the department as redundant (the DHS is proof this is also meaningless) or the like.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If something is not realistically achievable in the short term, that means we shouldn't be able to talk about it?

I disagree. If we limit discourse only to the immediately achievable we stop talking about how things should be, and how best to get there. Sometimes change happens overnight, sometimes it takes decades. It's worth talking about.

[–] johnthedoe@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It definitely feels like a lost cause banning guns. It’s part of the culture. When we banned guns in Australia after one single mass shooting, I don’t believe Australia had nearly as much of a gun loving culture. It was still seen as a tool in the country side for hunting and such. I don’t know the answer to changing culture. It’ll take generations possibly. Smoking was seen like an everyday thing in the 60s. Now it’s disgusting. Perception can change eventually.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Most people are not asking to "get rid of guns." Most people are asking for restrictions that keep people safe, not least our school children, and a ban on military-style weapons like AR-15s. That's not unreasonable nor impossible.

[–] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AR-15s are functionally the same as the majority of rifles, they're semi automatic. Calling AR-15s military style immediately shows you know almost nothing about guns.

We'd have a better return on our investment banning handguns which are used in more deadly non-police shootings by a whole fucking lot.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd call AR-15s military style. It's ok if you don't. No matter what you call them, it's idiotic that random people run around with them.

[–] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can you define what about them makes you consider them military style?

And what are you thinking of when you say "random people running around with them", because legally anyone who purchases them is required to pass an FBI background check to make sure they're not a felon, among other things.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I consider semi-automatic and automatic firearms to be military style.

By "random" I just mean anyone who can pass a background check. The easy access to weapons is what stands out in American society when it comes to gun violence.

[–] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I consider semi-automatic and automatic firearms to be military style.

So just to be clear, that's 99% of guns, and automatic is essentially already out of the equation since nobody makes or sells those anymore because of ATF regulations. Virtually all modern guns are semi automatic.

You do know AR-15s that consumers can buy are already not automatic right?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can try to twist my words as much as you want. Nothing new there. All I'm doing is calling for a ban on any weapon that's designed to kill as many people as possible in as little time as possible.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

"Twisting your words" (which didnt hapoen) then you go and use sophist goalpost moving.

Nice.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO a more robust mental and other healthcare system and social services would go a lot farther in preventing these kinds of things. Identifying and fixing/containing the people that are so deranged that they would kill others would stop most killings and the kinds of things that lead up to it. Most of the gun crime is a symptom of a much larger problem of people with little to no support lashing out.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You think Americans are just that much more mentally ill than people in every other developed country on earth? Of course not. The one thing that stands out in the US is easy access to weapons.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Yes I do but that's beside the point. The vast majority of gun owners never do anything criminal with them. It's people with mental health problems who snap or criminals who're using them to perpetrate other crimes (many of whom would probably not be criminals if they had proper social support.

Countries with strict gun control haven't solved the root of the problem. People can still be dangerous without guns and if we can't trust someone to own a gun we really shouldn't trust them to have free reign to interact with society without supervision either.

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Every gun shoots lead all the same. It doesn't matter what "style" it is.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So it shouldn't matter if people are only allowed to own black powder muskets then, right?

Every gun shoots lead all the same. It doesn’t matter what “style” it is.

Then banning some of them should pose no problem for gun enthusiasts.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I though we were switching over to environmentally friendly tungsten?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, who's talking about banning guns? Literally nobody in the thread has mentioned it and I did read all the comments. I even did a quick ctrl+f for keywords just to make sure and found nothing.

[–] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where exactly? If that comment isn't older than my comment or comes as a result of the person I was replying to planting the seed I'm probably gonna block you

[–] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol alright bro, please do it.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sure you read the comments? Lmao.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Link to a comment, go ahead