this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
780 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59346 readers
6698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oxford study proves heat pumps triumph over fossil fuels in the cold::Published Monday in the scientific journal Joule, the research found that heat pumps are two to three times more efficient than their oil and gas counterparts, specifically in temperatures ranging from 10 C to -20 C.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

A/C guy who's the son of an A/C guy here. Heat pumps lose efficiency the colder it gets. I wouldn't bother with one if you're in a northern climate. Lower midwest, you might be able to save money with a heat pump over natural gas, but it will depend heavily on the cost of the respective energy. For me, in the central US, we have great prices on gas and somewhat crappy prices on electricity (vs most surrounding regions) and it's definitely cheaper for me to stick with gas heat.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

So this is exactly what the article is about and up to -4 f heat pumps are more efficient.

If your the son of an hvac guy maybe your information is based on older installed units. I had a heat pump installed in my fathers home in the northeast ( non coastal) and I was shocked it ran well all year. I had heard the some rumor that you had.

Technology advanced and facts change.

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your information is outdated. It is even clearly mentioned in the one-sentence summary in the OP:

Oxford study proves heat pumps triumph over fossil fuels in the cold::Published Monday in the scientific journal Joule, the research found that heat pumps are two to three times more efficient than their oil and gas counterparts, specifically in temperatures ranging from 10 C to -20 C.

[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't say anything about gas prices.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the correct take for a conventional heat pump. However, there are relatively new geothermal heat pumps that can heat down to -30°C (-22°F) and are much more efficient.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/heat-pump-faq-1.6824634

[–] lud@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thankfully heat pumps have gotten better since your father's day. And natural gas is only going to keep getting more expensive. For a price of equipment that will last you 15-25 years it's becoming harder to justify gas heating.

For new builds ground source heat pumps should become more standard, they cost more, but they'll save a lot in the long run.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But its all irrelevant because the most effective way to keep warm is to continue with global warming. Soon we wont have a cold season to worry about. 😜

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know you're joking but the reality is we'll probably get worse cold weather alongside the warmer weather - the weather will be more extreme at either end.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Scary, isn't it?

Yet there are still people out there denying it.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you're on propane, it's more likely to be cheaper. Particularly over the course of an entire heating season, because they're more efficient in fall and spring than the coldest part of winter.

But yeah, this study wasn't looking at cost per therm but just raw COP, which is a pointless metric. It doesn't even compare the number of watts of heat from burning natural gas in a furnace vs in a modern power plant that supplies a heat pump. Although since we don't have a carbon tax, that's only a theoretically interesting comparison.

Heat pumps work fine for most people in the north. Mitsubishi's cold climate heat pumps supply 85% of their rated heat at -13F. Buffalo is a city known for its winters, and the last time Buffalo's lowest temperature was below that was 1982. They're just going to be a more expensive option for most people right now.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Well, some people don't put money higher than the ability of humanity to survive.

So the cost is less relevant than the pollution.

[–] plantedworld@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My father in law went to a heat pump instead of propane this year. No natural gas where he lives.

But he also dropped 20k on a solar system to power it.

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How long would the return on cost savings take for it to pay itself off?

[–] CoriolisSTORM88@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ditto. At least with gas I'm not paying Alabama Power's rates.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you posted that earlier today you would have gotten a spanking for saying anything critical about heat pumps. Or people just don’t like me in particular. Hard to tell.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe your information was just not factual?