this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
182 points (89.9% liked)

Technology

60073 readers
4357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Next step: EU forces RCS compatibility

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I hope not. RCS still has issues. Example, it still requires you to have a phone number. iMessage can be used with an email address.

The Apple insider podcast gents did a nice break down of this a few months ago. iMessage is a lot more than just proprietary RCS.

[–] cousinofjah@twit.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'd be happy with just a functional bridge between iMessage and RCS

[–] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It still has issues, but it's much better than SMS, which is currently the only option for messaging between Android and iOS.

[–] snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

only option for messaging between Android and iOS.

Well aside from like all the messaging apps, right?

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

All the not interconnected apps yes.

[–] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I meant "the only built-in option for messaging between Android and iOS." A lot of people don't want to install any third-party messaging apps.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think both things are valid. Apple should adopt RCS, but also that standard should be further pushed to include better features and not just stagnate

[–] June@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m willing to bet Apple will adopt RCS as soon as it can be implemented seamlessly.

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Never. The epic court case has evidence showing Apple views iMessage as a moat to hold their users hostage.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn’t it require Google servers to work also?

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, and people sending messages through Google’s servers have to use Google’s encryption keys.

[–] Graphine@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's be honest, who the fuck doesn't have a phone number in 2023? My 9 year old cousin has an iPhone SE.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that iMessage can be used with a computer or tablet that doesn’t have a phone number.

[–] Graphine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, that I can understand then.

[–] jennraeross@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Alas, sorting software is much cheaper to implement than differing hardware, so the cost benefit analysis would work out differently in that case I expect…

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Probably because iMessage will be forced to add interoperability using a protocol like Signal, Matrix or XMPP.

[–] Graphine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well we're already getting removable batteries which is exciting as fuck. That one will require even more of a major redesign that it will 100% come to the US.

All hail the EU for saving tech.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

US people are going to complain about that probay alot for a few years.