this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
36 points (62.7% liked)

World News

32351 readers
952 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It is the USA that has been the target of appeasement. Every expansion, every death squad, every war crime, every black site, every assassination, every war of aggression, every single time the world appeases the USA.

If you think the USA is appeasing China, your head is screwed on backwards. I know it's a common trope for abusers to feel offended and attacked when their victims standup for themselves, and I know you probably stand with the victims and see through the abusers' bullshit. You need to do that with the USA.

Abu Ghraib - appeased.
Nord Stream 2 - appeased.
Solemaini - appeased.
Iraq - appeased.
Iraq 2 - appeased.
Vietnam - appeased.
Laos - appeased.
Cambodia - appeased.
Korea - appeased.
Hiroshima - appeased.
Nagasaki - appeased.
Guantanamo - appeased.
Libya - appeased.
Syria - appeased.
StuxNet - appeased.
Pulling out of nuclear treaties - appeased.
Refusing to be accountable to ICC - appeased.
Refusing to sign landmine treaty - appeased.
Agent Orange - appeased.
Napalm - appeased.
White phosphorus - appeased.
Depleted Uranium - appeased.
Yugoslavia - appeased.
Afghanistan - appeased.
School of the Americas - appeased.
Wiretapping the entire US civilian population - appeased.
Wiretapping every embassy through Siemens supply chain attack - appeased.
NATO expansion - appeased.
Economic shock therapy kills millions - appeased.
Training terrorists - appeased.
Airlifting terrorists into other countries - appeased.
Environmental devastation - appeased.
Sending expired vaccines - appeased.
Refusing to send vaccines - appeased.
Refusing to follow the predefined protocol for sharing vaccine research - appeased.
Iranian regime change - appeased.
Color revolutions - appeased.
Extracting trillions from Africa - appeased.
Child separation - appeased.
Toddlers in solitary confinement - appeased.
Forced hysterectomies - appeased.
Collective punishment of civilians - appeased.
Support for Israeli apartheid - appeased.
Iran-Contra - appeased.
Fast and Furious - appeased.
CIA drug trafficking - appeased.
Haitian assassination - appeased.
Bolivia - appeased.
Nicaragua - appeased.
Pinochet - appeased.

I can keep going if you want.

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Fuck the United States. They’re easily the worst, most imperialist nation on the planet. But we’re capable of more nuance than “any country in opposition to the US can do no wrong”

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fuck the United States. They’re easily the worst, most imperialist nation on the planet.

"But somehow I keep finding all these familiar geopolitical flashpoints where I support them."

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 1 year ago (16 children)

What the fuck is wrong with you? The idea that the USA could possibly engage in appeasement is completely undermined by the fact that THEY ARE THE AGGRESSOR WHO IS BEING APPEASED. When China pushes back against the USA they are not doing something wrong, they are doing something against the USA's interests. When China doesn't push back against the USA, they are appeasing.

The entire analysis of "oh everyone is bad and therefore the USA shouldn't appease them" is completely structureless. It's all moron vibes.

[–] TomHardy@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago

You see - fuck the US - but if the US is putting 12 000 km away from their mainland military equipment on what they recognize as China's territory, it is actually "CCP imperialism" if they react ;)

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree, we are capable of more nuance than the ludicrous position you just made up right now to shut down the conversation before you have to do any uncomfortable introspection.

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You jumped to conclusions about my position and now you’re upset that your assumption was wrong? Sounds like a you problem.

[–] gobble_ghoul@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Blake@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

TIL, thanks! I'm not an American so I hadn't ever heard of that one. I removed my comment on it.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you not believe in supporting the lesser evil? I thought libs loved that shit.

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not a lib. And no, I don’t believe in supporting the lesser evil. I don’t support any evil.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not a lib.

Oh sorry, you're an ultra, my mistake.

How is it idealistically opposing everyone everywhere and never accomplishing anything?

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you try to attack an identity you’re assuming that I hold, rather than addressing my actual arguments? Could it be because you’re incapable of actually successfully arguing against the points I’m making?

And no, I’m not an “ultra”, though it’s quite a vaguely defined term, I’m not opposed to all of the structures that ultra-leftists are traditionally opposed to. Keep guessing, though. You’ll probably get it eventually. The world is a nuanced place and you shouldn’t try to shove everything into a convenient box to make it easier to deal with. That’s lib behaviour. You should know better.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Your argument seems to be that we should oppose all sides equally, regardless of context.

Do you even support anything?

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My argument is that neither side should invade the other and that they should peacefully coexist. I support peace, balanced reconciliation, and the end of capitalism.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Blake@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, my comment included the word appeasement. What’s your point?

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seem contradictory to use charged language like 'appeasement '. And then to say you want everyone to coexist peacefully. It seems to advocate for containment which isn't peaceful coexistence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago

Are you more interested in categorizing ideologies or in actual material conditions?

[–] NormalC@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How was the sex with that CPC party member like? Did he fuck the goodness into you?

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty good, actually! Thanks for asking. I don’t want to get into too many details, but let’s just say that the roles were reversed from what you’re imagining. He was a lovely guy, it’s a shame that he was so inflexible with his beliefs, we got along really well because we shared a lot of common ground. I think the India/China thing was the first thing we actually disagreed on, and that was enough to end our relationship. Which is absolutely fair, but it took me a bit by surprise at the time.

[–] NormalC@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

New hexbear tagline lmao. Also he probably broke up with you because you keep saying "CCP" instead of "CPC" and he realized you were a sinophobic racist lmao.

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He called it CCP himself lmfao you guys are so fucking funny. Love that being in a relationship with a Chinese guy meant that I was sinophobic. This is literally the most amusing thread I’ve ever created, I’m so glad I wrote my comment.

[–] NormalC@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ive never thought in all my time I would face a liberal whose source is "I fucked a communist and we broke up."

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Don’t worry, you still haven’t. Not a liberal.

[–] Grimble@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

You'll cheer them on if they fight China

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout.

You realize that if country A does something bad, "Country B did something bad too!" is not actually a defense of country A's behaviour? Indeed, it just implies that you agree that that behaviour is bad.

load more comments (29 replies)