PandaBearGreen

joined 2 years ago
[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Block the number. They have no authority where you live. True or not why pay the fascists?

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

A sovereign nation who's leadership drank the NATO kool-aid against the protest of their nuclear armed neighbor, goading them into a fight. The victims are the people of both nations.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

I actually have a position.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No one is justifying the acts of Russia. They should not have invaded! But to act like there is no pretext to conflict and Ukraine is completely innocent is disingenuous. Peace is the better option.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's like you have an opinion and don't all at the same time. Maybe reconsider your position.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Russia has definitely not engaged in total war.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

1989 Revolutions? Wholesale dismemberment of the USSR more like. And treaty didn't say it. The Russians sure as fuck did.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Modern gasoline has only 3-6 month of shelf life.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

The contradiction is saying that allowing a country to defend/enforce its borders is appeasement. The implications is that to do so is aggression.

[–] PandaBearGreen@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seem contradictory to use charged language like 'appeasement '. And then to say you want everyone to coexist peacefully. It seems to advocate for containment which isn't peaceful coexistence.

 

Bobby

view more: next ›