this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
659 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (6 children)

ITT people pretending this is a spite based move, when realistically it is probably cutting costs by reusing the same hardware they used for lightning ports just soldering on a USB-C port instead of a lightning one.

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A shining example of cutting edge Apple innovation

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you trying to suggest the company that invented rounded corners isn't innovative enough?!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Next they will claim they invented cutting corners...

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

dude usb 3.0 is 15 years old by now, and they're a trillion dollar company. They'll manage, this is 100% by choice

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 year ago

On a thousand dollar phone

[–] nathris@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

The SoC lacks the hardware. Even the USB C iPads with A series chips operate at 2.0 speeds. They can only do 5Gbit in host mode, like with an external SSD. Plugged in to a computer they are 2.0.

I would imagine future chips will have the capability, once the Pro chips trickle down to the base models.

[–] wieli99@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

You think this more likely than just creating a bigger artificial difference between the standard and normal model?

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That, and also, how many iPhone users do you think will actually notice slower USB speeds? One percent? They literally do not need 3.0 to keep their customers happy. And they're not going to poach many Android fanboys with this change, so who cares?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm going over... that's literally all I needed from them. Consumer choice is all lesser evils atm.

RIP Firefox phone and Samsung Pure.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe it's both. Apple said that they'd be compliant with the EU regulations of having usb-c as a port for any cell phone with a charging port. I don't remember the exact wording, but a valid interpretation was that usb-c is not required if the device has no charging port. I believe apple is moving towards exclusively QI-charging and wireless connection. Reducing the capability of wired connections would in that case just be a way to move the users towards the planned infrastructure.

So it's both a spiteful move regarding the regulations, but also a move which reduces costs and pushes users their desired way.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe apple is moving towards exclusively QI-charging and wireless connection.

I sure hope not. I'd have to take off my case every time I wanted to charge my phone.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I charge my samsung just fine with a decently fat case. Does apple have a weaker QI receptor?