this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
674 points (99.9% liked)

196

16566 readers
1713 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So, people who love North Korea, or defend russia invading Ukraine, people, who stand by even the most autoritarian, anti-democratic, militaristic, imperialistic regimes - just because they call themselves “socialist” or “communist” - are “Tankies”.

Would be good to point out these people you are mentioning are not all the same.

There are people that Are critical of Russia, but don't buy from western propaganda and are being called tankies too.

It is more like, if one dare to question the western narrative = tankie.

[–] fae@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

but don't buy from western propaganda

i.e. are critical of russia, but stand by even the most autoritarian, anti-democratic, militaristic, imperialistic regimes - just because they call themselves “socialist” or “communist”, except for russias invasion of ukraine

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol.

most autoritarian, anti-democratic, militaristic, imperialistic regimes

you meant UK, USA or both?

[–] fae@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i was just quoting the other commenter. but dont forget about china, nazi germany, north korea, etc.

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah sure. So lets ban the USA apologists together with all these tankies?

[–] fae@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you not notice how you're falling on the side of liberal anticommunists even within this thread? I think by that alone it would be worth seriously considering if you had been misinformed on some of these issues.

[–] fae@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

idk what u mean by that. im an anarcho-communist. and imo tankies are very anti-communist, even if they dont want to admit that to themselves.

[–] robinn@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

How are China or North Korea imperialist? (especially the latter) Please don't talk about Taiwan since it has been a part of China since before the 17th century. Imperialist Japan forcibly seized this territory in 1895. The UN has recognized the One-China Principle which is why Taiwan does not have a seat at the UN. "臺灣民眾統獨立場趨勢分佈", conducted by Taiwan's National Chengchi University, an explicitly anti-CPC source, in 2022, showed the following results with regards to the perspective of Taiwanese citizens on independence and reunification: (Status Quo as Autonomous Part of China and Complete Unification Compiled [part of PRC] : 63.4%) (General Support for Independence Including Status Quo Moving Towards Independence [not part of PRC]: 30.3%) (Non-Response: 6.3%). There is no argument for Taiwan relations being an imperialist endeavor by the mainland.

And anti-democratic? The CPC and various Chinese government posts have the vast (over 90%) support of the populace due to land reform, poverty alleviation, and mass line influence through centralized unions and engagement with representatives. The DPRK also has democratic elements.

Authoritarian? What does this mean? Authority is not something that exists independently from conditions and purpose. In class society, authority is mainly wielded by the dictatorship of certain classes (and what idiot would condemn the authority wielded by the socialists besieged by the capitalists of the whole world?). Authoritarianism is a "left wing" form of the fascist concept of "totalitarianism" meant to equate various forms of class rule under the banner of "authority".

Militaristic? It is incredibly ignorant to talk of the DPRK's militarism given the rapacious imperialistic U.S, occupying the southern half of the country, starving them, and performing expensive mock military drills yearly along the border to provoke conflict—this itself being a remnant of the U.S. invasion and division which claimed the lives of ~3.3 million Koreans (10% of the population of the peninsula) (see Cumings, The Korean War: A Modern History, p. 45-46). Some have the luxury of condemning "militarism" and military mobilization in such dire circumstances because they live in the imperialist center; some do not. Note: China is not overly "militaristic" by any scale.

It takes this long to refute a single sentence of nonsense. Anarchists are so pathetic.

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

btw seens a paradox that you guys so "pro freedom" are asking for bans of people that you disagree.

[–] fae@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it may seem that way, but no. pro-freedom actually means keeping people away who wanna take our freedom. i.e. authoritarians like tankies

[–] HornyOnMain@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

isn't that the same logic that the tankies are using though - because they think they have to be authoritarian to the people who they believe are trying to take their freedoms i.e. capitalists?

[–] fae@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

a community not welcoming assholes =/= a state killing everyone who's in their way. one is authoritarian, the other is not.

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

keeping people away who wanna take our freedom. i.e. authoritarians like tankies

what did they do to take your freedom? built this whole platform we are using right now?

[–] fae@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

just because they do good things too doesnt make them perfect

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am not arguing they are perfect. It is just extreme to ban those folks altogether.

Neither are we perfect.

[–] fae@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i disagree. if you welcome one, they will all come and bring their friends, and then u have a tankie community ;)

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh right. Then we should treat them like cockroaches, right?

The Canadians came up with an idea you might agree, it is called "Final Solution".

[–] GuyDudeman@possumpat.io 7 points 1 year ago

LOL... ironic, since those of us how don't like tankies specifically don't like them because tankies are perfectly fine with mass-murder, and we're not.

[–] fae@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

fuckin hell im not saying genocide them, theres literally a fucking lemmy instance just for them. they can go there, tankies not welcome here.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

"Paradox of tolerance"