proletariatnerd

joined 1 year ago
 

Does someone tried any of these scripts yet?

3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi to c/irc@lemm.ee
 

Hi,

I'm trying to set up a simple IRC server for myself and some friends as part of my homelab. I already have an Active Directory server that I use for centralized password management, and I'm looking to use LDAP to connect with it so that only users with an account can use my IRC relay. I'm fairly certain that this should be possible, because inspIRCd has an LDAP module, and Active Directory can be accessed through LDAP, but I just can't figure out the configuration. I've recompiled inspIRCd with the m_ldapauth module, but I can't figure out the configuration. Here's what I have so far in my ./conf/inspircd.conf (I replaced a few values with redacted just to not give away too much about my network, but all of these values are filled with real data in my actual config)

lemmy does not accept xml code

Right now when I try to connect to the server with weechat, I just get "Access denied." I've tried filling every field labeled username or password in the weechat settings with a valid username and password, but nothing seems to work. I know for a fact that the irc server can reach the Active Directory server, as I can use ldapsearch to contact the server. I was previously getting "no password provided" when I looked in startup.log on the server, but now I don't get anything. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

 

lol you are being just pathetic.

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you taking a personal vendetta against the devs? LOL

This is some really McCarthyism here.

Stop being lame, my dude.

For the person dying of hunger is the same. But yeah, killing millions is bad and is something America NEVER did, right?

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh right. Then we should treat them like cockroaches, right?

The Canadians came up with an idea you might agree, it is called "Final Solution".

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I am not arguing they are perfect. It is just extreme to ban those folks altogether.

Neither are we perfect.

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

keeping people away who wanna take our freedom. i.e. authoritarians like tankies

what did they do to take your freedom? built this whole platform we are using right now?

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah sure. So lets ban the USA apologists together with all these tankies?

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 19 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Genocide and pol pot is terrible. So is the USA.

[–] proletariatnerd@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

btw seens a paradox that you guys so "pro freedom" are asking for bans of people that you disagree.

view more: next ›