this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
1822 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

55746 readers
5884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tech's broken promises: Streaming is now just as expensive and confusing as cable. Ubers cost as much as taxis. And the cloud is no longer cheap::Some tech is getting pricier and looking a lot like the older services it was supposed to beat. From video streaming to ride-hailing and cloud computing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's your fault for believing the promises of a salesman. Tech bros are just industrial middlemen who pedel new technological solutions for problems that may or may not benefit from it, but that doesn't matter to them, they're just here to sell the tech. Thats how they get paid.

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There was never a world in which TV companies like Disney and NBC could lose cable subscribers (yes comcast manages the subs, but they pay Disney and NBC carriage fees from subscription fees) and make streaming cheaper than cable. So if you are losing a lot of money via cord cutting, and then you have the expense of standing up your own streaming service... Yeah, it's going to probably cost the same as fees the cable company used to kick back to Disney. The difference is that if you want all the content from everyone, you need to then to get all the app subscriptions. However, you no longer get the bundled price that provided some discount via cable.

I don't know that there was ever a promise that streaming would be cheaper. It could be more a la carte, but the cost for the content was never going to change in the eyes of the tv companies that now have the added operation cost of maintaining an app.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it's MY fault that there are fewer cabs because other mother fuckers stopped using them?

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yep, my entire post was about was about TimewornTraveler and no one else. Its definitely all your fault. Pay no attention to the fact that I said 'for believing tech bros' which would exclude anyone who didn't believe tech bros from the statement, Instead just get upset about nothing.

[–] focusedkiwibear@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

maybe don't make such a general blanket statement that anyone could take offense from, next time maybe? maybe don't blame anyone for corporate greed except the corporates who are greeding instead of getting upset about nothing

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

The 'general statement' had a very specific qualifier that the op ignored in order to make himself upset. It had nothing to do with generality and everything to do with ignoring half a sentence so someone could make themselves mad.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can see the absurdity of my statement but not of yours.... odd

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You literally ignored half of the sentence you have a problem with so you could be contrarian. Odd.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I dont know why I'm still responding to this tedious, disingenuous bullshit but here goes.... You made a statement: "It's your fault." Ambiguous "your", fine, I'll happily challenge that. Then you gave a supporting statement: "Tech bros only want money." Cool. I agree with the latter part. But you are using it to support a conclusion that I don't agree with. Hence I attacked the fucking conclusion instead of the supporting details.

Do you understand now?

Instead of blaming the people who use these services - and make blanket statements as if we are all using those services - how about you either A) stick to criticizing the bad actors or B) shut the fuck up.

Okay? Thanks. Talk to you later.