this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
1832 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
5145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
1832
Tech's broken promises: Streaming is now just as expensive and confusing as cable. Ubers cost as much as taxis. And the cloud is no longer cheap (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
288 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tech's broken promises: Streaming is now just as expensive and confusing as cable. Ubers cost as much as taxis. And the cloud is no longer cheap::Some tech is getting pricier and looking a lot like the older services it was supposed to beat. From video streaming to ride-hailing and cloud computing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can see the absurdity of my statement but not of yours.... odd

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You literally ignored half of the sentence you have a problem with so you could be contrarian. Odd.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dont know why I'm still responding to this tedious, disingenuous bullshit but here goes.... You made a statement: "It's your fault." Ambiguous "your", fine, I'll happily challenge that. Then you gave a supporting statement: "Tech bros only want money." Cool. I agree with the latter part. But you are using it to support a conclusion that I don't agree with. Hence I attacked the fucking conclusion instead of the supporting details.

Do you understand now?

Instead of blaming the people who use these services - and make blanket statements as if we are all using those services - how about you either A) stick to criticizing the bad actors or B) shut the fuck up.

Okay? Thanks. Talk to you later.