this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
885 points (80.5% liked)

Memes

45528 readers
1071 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (72 children)

I hadn't experienced hexbear (literally) shitting up the place yet, has a way to block entire instances been implemented or do I gotta find a new one that isn't federated with them?

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (55 children)

if you're incapable of seeing perspectives outside the mainstream I hear Reddit is nice this time of year

[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I can tune out tankie nonsense (not accusing everyone at hexbear of being tankies, but you guys sure do hang out with a lot of them) pretty easily, it's the 20 full pages of literal pig shit I'm talking about

[–] charlie@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hopefully they fix the emoji bug soon (or whenever they want to get around to it honestly), I find it hilarious but I can most definitely feel for those caught in the cross-fire.

[–] forcequit@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We ought to be putting them behind spoiler tags in the meantime tbh.
If anything, the click-through just adds to the anticipation

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

I think it's someone who does a lot of nitrous oxide at Phish concerts

[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course I know a tankie it's me.

[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

My personal definition would be "authoritarian communist (or """communist""") regime supporters/apologists". I think a good litmus test is, if the topic of the Tiananmen Square massacre comes up, and their first input is "Ok, but, how many zeroes did the number of dead civilians really have", they're probably too far gone to bother engaging much with

Too many anarchist/commune types consider the authoritarians to be their allies because they also hate the capitalists, right up until the point they're next on the list of undesirables destined for the wall

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok so a tankie is anyone who questions the baseless assertions of western regimes, the truth isn't actaully important to you, what matters is whether someone upholds obvious falsehoods and reinforces state propaganda but from the west

Got ya buddy

[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I forgot to add "struggles with reading comprehension", that's also a big indicator

[–] Flaps@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • starts whining about Hexbear
  • starts calling people tankies
  • uses debunked western narrative about tiananmen as litmus test
  • gets pushback
  • 'you can't read'
  • continues whining about hexbear
[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I didn't call anyone a tankie, a whole bunch of people from hexbear sure did show up feeling incredibly offended by my description of tankies though, if they want to out themselves like that, that's on them

[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

No, most of us are tankies. We think using tanks on Hungarian fascists was cool and good.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Baseless accusations, lies, peddling long since-disproven myths and then whining when the consequences come around do actually offend me, you got me

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

"Reading comprehension" is when you accept everything you read at face value, I'm not really surprised that's something you believe

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

👏 Then 👏 read 👏 the 👏 Wiki 👏 page 👏

Because that will tell you the answer is 1. One zero. Because the number of dead civilians in the Tiananmen Square Massacre is zero. No civilian deaths there. Nada. Read the wiki page, it will tell you no deaths. This information brought to you by such Commies as:

  • the US Government,
  • the Washington Post correspondent (who was there all night),
  • the CBS correspondent (same),
  • and more!

Were there a limited number of deaths in protests elsewhere that wasn't Tiananmen? Yep, about 2-3 hundred across a few hundred cities. And that's bad! But is also pretty dang small relative to the protest size, and happens in all major protests in all countries everywhere.

[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Sorry I forgot to add "Ok but, were they really inside the square, or just near it?"

Spending the first 7/8ths of your comment dancing around the main issue (at a minimum hundreds, thankfully you at least have to admit to that since those are the official Chinese numbers, potentially thousands, of civilian protestors being killed by the Chinese military), laser focusing on some minor detail like it's a great big gotcha, then brushing the whole thing off at the end with "Yep it's bad, but it happens shrug" is exactly what I'm talking about

I guess I should at least thank you for so deftly illustrating my point though

[–] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

A few hundred cities across the country is not "near it" Something like half of the dead were cops or military. You should do some reading about where the weapons that killed them came from. Interesting stuff!

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

laser focusing on some minor detail.

Like you just did? Focusing in on location? Instead of taking in the larger argument? Your hypocrisy reeks

[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

point out the classic tactic of spending a lot of time picking apart minor details in an attempt to discredit the whole

no u

My impression was that you guys were supposed to be more eloquent than this

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

eloquence is spent on those deserving it. Why engage civilly with you when it's obvious you're not interested in good faith discourse? horsepoo-theory

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] LinkedinLenin@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like that definition would include a lot of anarchists I know tbh

[–] trafficnab@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would hope there's not too many useful idiots who think left unity will get them anything but a free ride to a "re-education" camp

[–] MiguelParenti@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

You talk about having reading comprehension like it's the ultimate skill in understanding yet you're talking about re-education camps as if they're an existing thing for that matter. You should get some media literacy skills before you go around acting smug about knowing how the world works

[–] LinkedinLenin@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Idk I don't think that's a very useful or accurate way to look at things. I do a lot of organizing and mutual aid alongside leftists of all types, (as well as liberals).

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

You realize that even in the wildest fantasies of Xi Jinping's biggest fans, every single Western capitalist country is generations away from revolution? We can do left unity because 0.000% of communism or anarchism have been built, and the early stages of building either involve the same goals: getting workers to stand in solidarity with each other instead of fighting over petty trivial nonsense like "tankies" online. There is literally 0 harm that so called "authoritarians" pose to other leftists, in fact the same leftists who clutch their pearls over "tankies" tend to be the ones defending imperialism and the imposition of western economic hegemony on the imperial periphery (as long as they get healthcare!). What is more authoritarian and useful-idiot-esque than that?

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

My personal definition would be "authoritarian communist (or """communist""") regime supporters/apologists".

What does this actually mean? Is Nelson Mandela a "tankie" to you? You might think I'm being facetious, but I'm serious. I'll link some photographs and quotes from Mandela that a lot of the capitalists in charge want you to forget:

"I read works by and about Che Guevara, Mao Tse-tung, Fidel Castro. In Edgar Snow’s brilliant Red Star Over China I saw that it was Mao’s determination and non-traditional thinking that had led him to victory."

“The revolution in China was a masterpiece, a real masterpiece. If you read how they fought that revolution, you believe in the impossible. It’s just miraculous.”

"From its earliest days, the Cuban Revolution has also been a source of inspiration to all freedom-loving people. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of the vicious imperialist-orchestrated campaign to destroy the impressive gain made in the Cuban Revolution."

"Within that international support for our struggle the Soviet Union and other socialist countries stood out. The governments and peoples of the socialist bloc gave material, moral and political support to our struggle in a manner and on a scale that we will never be able to repay."

So again, does this make Nelson Mandela a "tankie"? If so, what does it say about "tankies " and the west, in that the so called "tankies" supported Mandela in the fight against apartheid, while the west did not. In fact, the west often supported apartheid. Even Antony Blinken admitted to that recently.

"The Soviet Union was supportive of the freedom forces in South Africa, and of course unfortunately, more than unfortunately, the United States was much too sympathetic to the apartheid regime, so that history also doesn’t get erased, you know, overnight, it's a process," Blinken said.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The tianamen square protests were no actual witnesses saw anything happen and we're every alleged eyewitness have been proben to have lied? That.protest? The protest where "people were mushed up" but all fotos of the square show no such bodies (except for police officers that had been lynched by the protesters)? That protest?
The protest were the most famous video is of a guy blocking tanks who is then peacefully escorted away? https://streamable.com/unjnw9

Also define authoritarian

[–] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes I'm a tankie and I'm coming to seize all your property and put you in a gulag for re-education until you accept that Liberalism is a disease

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Egon@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Libs act like they live in a gulag archipelago, they're so worried about what "muh tankies" will do, despite the fact that they're all in the same picket line and a cop is gonna shoot them before they ever get close to any situation where such a philosophical disagreement would matter

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I can tune out tankie nonsense.

Tankie nonsense is when you challenge obvious incorrect statements with proven facts and material reality, and the more lies you challenge the more Tankie you are.

Define Tankie without using Wikipedia or the word "authoritarian". (Tankies were people that supported the USSR intervention in Hungary in the 70's, being left-wing isn't being a Tankie)

uhm, if you can't handle hexbear at its tankiest, you don't deserve hexbear at its best

load more comments (49 replies)
load more comments (65 replies)