this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
142 points (88.2% liked)

Games

32499 readers
2869 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have the lowest of low expectations for Nintendo consoles. They're always filled to the brim with gimmicks, that while creative, are not fun to use and then the best games are always ones that completely disregard the gimmicks anyhow. I wish they would focus more on making consoles that LOOK and FEEL good when you're playing instead of trying to create the next new thing no one will care about in 5 years. They also really lost the plot on the Pokemon franchise and I feel like that will start to lose them a lot of money when people start to wake up from their comas and realize Gamefreak doesn't know how to make video games and the last good one they made was am eternity ago.

[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish they would focus more on making consoles that LOOK and FEEL good when you’re playing instead of trying to create the next new thing no one will care about in 5 years.

Isn't this basically what they did with the Switch? It's very low on gimmicks that never get used (infrared? Touchscreen?), its games on the whole look pretty good (Most first party titles), and people still play it over 6 years later. Also Nintendo has nothing to do with the development of Pokémon - so while shit, they hardly deserve the blame for that.

[–] ianis@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a hand held console with detachable joycons

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The “joycons” don’t bring me joy. They make my hands cramp and are only full of cons.

[–] kurosawaa@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the joy cons make it great for party games, it's really convenient to get a 4 player game of Mario Cart going with just two pairs of joy cons.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah until someone gets one with drift

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You're supposed to drift in Mario Kart! /s

[–] all-knight-party@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

Third parties do it for me. Sadly, I wish Nintendo would release official ergonomic joy cons. Instead I must buy something Chinese with questionable QC, to get something fully featured compared to the feature-neutered but high-quality Hori licensed ones.

[–] rabirabirara@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No offense, but I and all my friends enjoy the joycons a lot. It's been wonderful in college and out. I have a sneaking suspicion the people complaining about the switch are not the... target audience anyway.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eh, really it's a cheap android tablet (sold at a markup) that has a built in slots for some gimmick Bluetooth controllers.

To those I've answered... I'm right though. Your switch isn't some magically engineered hardware from Nintendo. It's an underpowered android tablet. The only thing Nintendo brought was the joycons. And most games don't use the gimmicks of those controllers, because the pro controller exists and it's compatible with every non-gimmick game. And yes it's a cheap android tablet, it was criticized for being underpowered and using it of date hardware when it was new! Look at its hardware, look at the price. Look at say an Nvidia shield and look at its price.

[–] HellAwaits@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Isn’t this basically what they did with the Switch? It’s very low on gimmicks that never get used (infrared? Touchscreen?)

Well, the switch actually has a touchscreen, so not sure what point you're trying to make. Also, the joycons aren't as study as everyone thinks they are including the drifting issue that Nintendo loves to ignore.

Also Nintendo has nothing to do with the development of Pokémon - so while shit, they hardly deserve the blame for that.

Nintendo, Gamefreak, and Creatures Inc. are all co-owners of Pokemon, but Nintendo is the largest shareholder of the three, so yeah if Nintendo looks at the train-wreck launch of the Pokemon games and says little, then they do get the blame for it.

[–] FromAbyss@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, Gamefreak has been shitting out Pokémon "games" for decades now, right? If they didn't realize that in the last 15 years, would they really care about the next 15? I almost feel like each generation becomes the "default Pokémon experience" for their players.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nha bruh how much copium do you need to accept SV while we had fricking B2W2 and yet it could still have been much more (while on release B1W1 was still shunned but thats beside the point).

SV is playable, thats it.

[–] panja@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Gamefreak doesn't know how to make video games and the last good one they made was am eternity ago.

Unfortunately I doubt anything will change because people continue to buy no matter how bad it is